2026 Supreme(Online)(CONSUMER) 16
Jatinder Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Deccan Clap India Pvt Ltd – Respondent
Consumer Complaint No.: DC/80/CC/47/2025
##PAGE1##
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I (North District)
[Govt. of NCT of Delhi]
Ground Floor, Court Annexe -2 Building, Tis Hazari Court Complex, Delhi- 110054
Phone: 011-23969372; 011-23912675 Email: confo-nt-dl@nic.in
Consumer Complaint No.: DC/80/CC/47/2025
In the matter of
Jatinder Kapoor
R/o E-2/29, Gali No. 2
Shashtri Nagar, Delhi-110052
Also at
H. No. 1858, Sector 46
Gurugram- 122003 (Haryana) … Complainant
VERSUS
M/s Deccan Clap- India Pvt Ltd
Through its Authorised Person/ AR
Having its Corporate Office at
Manjeera Trinity Corporate Unit 104
1st Floor, Besides Lulu Mall
KPHB, Hyderabad- 500085 … Opposite Party No. 1
Deccan Clap, 1st Floor
Building No. 2632, Opposite to Metro Pillar No. 215
Near Shadipur Metro Station
Shadipur, Delhi- 110008 … Opposite Party No. 2
Tapan Kumar Jana
S/o M Jana
DC/80/CC/47/2025 Page 1 of 6
##PAGE2##Sub-contractor
R/o C-52, Second Floor
Indra Enclave, Neb Sarai
South Delhi, IGNOU, Delhi- 110068 … Opposite Party No. 3
ORDER
13.05.2026
(Divya Jyoti Jaipuriar)
1. By way of this complaint, the Complainant herein has alleged deficiency
of service on part of M/s Decan Clap- India Pvt Ltd (OP-1 herein), its local
office at Shadipur, Delhi (OP-2 herein) and its sub-contractor namely Sh. Tapan
Kumar Jana (OP-3 herein) by not delivering the services of painting and
polishing work of his home completely. The Complainant is in possession of a
property bearing House No. 1885, Sector 46, Gurugram, Haryana for which he
engaged the services of a painter for painting of the house and polishing of
furniture. For the said purpose, he contacted OP-1 and OP-2 which engaged the
services of OP-3.
2. It is the case of the Complainant that when he contacted the OP-1 and oP-
2 in the month of April 2024, he was given an estimate of Rs. 1,26,814/-. But
the Complainant did not go ahead with the order and he contacted the OP-1 and
OP-2 in the month of September, 2024 for a fresh quotation. In September,
2024, OP-1 and OP-2, after conducting a fresh survey of the property, gave an
estimate vide estimate no. 2274, an estimate of Rs. 1,07,325.60/- for the
painting and polishing services. Subsequently, OP-1 and OP-2 introduced OP-3
as sub-contractor for the assignment and the Complainant made a payment od
Rs. 10,000/- as advance for the services of OPs on 25.09.2024. The painting
assignment was supposed to start immediately, but as the Complainant alleges,
there was substantial delay in starting the painting and polishing work. It is also
the case of the Complainant that the OPs, unilaterally revised the estimate vide
DC/80/CC/47/2025 Page 2 of 6
##PAGE3##estimate no. 236 dated 01.12.2024 to Rs. 1,45,130.40. The Complainant, under
duress agreed to the said revised estimate and made further payments of Rs.
40,000/- and Rs. 20,000/- 03.12.2024 and 12.12.2024 respectively. It is the case
of the Complainant that the painting work started only in first week of
December, 2024, but the pace of the work was very slow. The OPs stopped the
work midway on 3.12.2024 and demanded another revision of the estimate. The
Complainant refused to revise the estimate, but the OPs sent another revised
estimate of Rs. 2,28,147/- vide estimate No. 366 dated 22.01.2025. At this
stage, the Complainant refused to further variation in the estimate and
demanded the OPs to refund the amount previously paid by the Complainant to
the OPs. The Complainant also sent a legal notice to the OPs followed by which
this complaint was filed.
3. We issued notices to the OPs and the notices were served to all the
parties, As none of the OPs filed their respective replies within limitation period
as prescribed under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, we closed
their right to file their replies in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the matter of New India Assurance company Limited Vs. Hilli
Multipurpose Cold Storage Private Limited, [(2020) 5 SCC 757]. Thereafter,
the Complainant filed is evidence, which was followed by filing of written
arguments by Complainant and OP-1&2 and final argu