2026 Supreme(Online)(CONSUMER) 22
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Moidadin – Appellant
Versus
TATA AIG Insurance Company Ltd – Respondent
CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. DC/AB1/670/CC/117/2024
##PAGE1##
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SOUTH II
CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. DC/AB1/670/CC/117/2024
MOIDADIN
PRESENT ADDRESS - H.NO. 19, RATAUL, BAGHPAT-250101SOUTH EAST,DELHI.
.......Complainant(s)
Versus
TATA AIG INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
PRESENT ADDRESS - 22, 2nd FLOOR, COMMUNITY CENTER, NEW FRIENDS COLONY,
NEW DELHI-110065.SOUTH EAST,DELHI.
.......Opposite Party(s)
BEFORE:
MONIKA AGGARWAL SRIVASTAVA , PRESIDENT
DR. RAJENDER DHAR , MEMBER
RITU GARODIA , MEMBER
FOR THE COMPLAINANT:
NEMO
FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTY:
NEMO
DATED: 22/05/2026
ORDER
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION – X
GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
Udyog Sadan, C – 22 & 23, Institutional Area
(Behind Qutub Hotel)
New Delhi – 110016
Case No.117/2024
Moidadin
S/o Sh. Maousam,
R/o H. No.19, Rataul,
Baghpat- 250101(U.P.) ……Complainant
##PAGE2##VERSUS
TATA AIG Insurance Company Ltd.
Through Its authorized representative
nd
22, 2 Floor, Community Centre,
New Delhi-110065 …… Opposite Party
Date of Institution- 02.04.2024
Date of Order- 22.05.2026
O R D E R
DR. RAJENDER DHAR-MEMBER
1. The complaint pertains to alleged deficiency in service on the part of the OP.
2. Facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant had taken a home loan of
Rs.23,50,000/- from AU Small Finance Bank Ltd. vide sanction letter dated
23.03.2023. Copy of the sanction letter is annexed as Annexure C-2
3. The complainant further submits that to secure this loan, an insurance master policy
was issued by OP for the period 30.04.2023 to 29.04.2028, with a premium of
Rs.31,723/- paid directly from the loan amount covering risks including Critical
Illness, Accidental Death, and Permanent Total Disability, subject to specific terms
and conditions. Copy of the insurance policy is annexed as Annexure C-3
4. On 24.08.2023, the complainant was admitted to Metro Hospital and diagnosed with
lung cancer, a condition that eventually required the surgical removal of one lung and
left him unable to work. Copy of the treatment documents is annexed as Annexure C-
4
5. Consequently, the complainant filed a claim with OP, requesting they fulfil their
##PAGE3##obligations under the policy by repaying the outstanding home loan.
6. The claim was rejected vide email on 15.12.20 23 on the grounds of "non-
declaration of facts about Heart Disease" at the time of proposing the insurance,
leading to an ab-initio cancellation of the policy. Copy of email dated 15.12.2023 is
annexed as Annexure C-5. The complainant alleged this rejection is untenable and
illegal, asserting that while he was treated for heart issues in the past, he was never
diagnosed with the cancer that occurred during the policy tenure.
7. The complainant prayed that OP to comply with the terms and conditions of the
Insurance Policy No.0239503493 and direct OP to pay the sum insured under the said
insurance policy with interest for the date of rejection of the claim i.e. 15.12.2023,
Rs.50,000/- as compensation and cost of litigation.
8. OP in his reply admitted that the complainant had obtained a "Group Credit Secure
Plus Medical Insurance Policy" through AU Small Finance Bank Limited under
Master Policy No. 0239503493. This policy was valid from 30.04.2023 to 29.04.2028
for an insured sum of Rs.23,50,000/-, covering risks including Critical Illness,
Accidental Death, and Permanent Total Disability, subject to specific terms and
conditions.
9. Upon receipt of the complainant's claim (Claim No. 0822607598A) for medical
treatment of "Right Sided Synovial Sarcoma," the OP conducted a scrutiny of the
medical records. It was discovered that the complainant had been admitted to Rajiv
Gandhi Super Specialty Hospital from 08.10.2020 to 09.10.2020 and was diagnosed
with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Double Vessel Disease (DVD), and had
undergone PTCA (Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).
10. The OP contended that the complainant was a known case of heart disease
since 2020, which predated the inception of the policy. Since this material fact was
suppressed and not disclosed in the proposal form, the OP repud