SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CONSUMER) 34

CONSUMER
Ravneet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Himalayan Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Consumer Complaint No. : DC/25/CC/143/2024



##PAGE1##

Ravneet Singh & anr. Vs Himalayan Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd.

1

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, UNA, CAMP AT SOLAN , DISTRICT

SOLAN , HIMACHAL PRADESH.

Consumer Complaint No. : DC/25/CC/143/2024

Date of Presentation : 08-01-2025

Date of Decision : 12-06-2026

In the matter of :-

1) Smt. Ravneet Singh wife of Sukhmandir Singh

resident of House No. C-25, East of Kailash, New Delhi –

110065.

2) Sukhmandir singh son of Harbhajan Singh resident of

House No. C-25, East of Kailash, New Delhi – 110065.

----------Complainants

Versus

1) Himalayan Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd., through its

Director, Registered office: 2-201, Himalayan

Dreams, Village Gulhari, Dharampur-Kanda Road,

Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, HP – 173209.

2) Vicar Walia, authorised Signatory Himalayan

Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office: 2-201,

Himalayan Dreams, Village Gulhari , Dharampur-

Kanda Road, Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, HP-

173209.

---- Opposite parties

Complaint under Section 35 of The

Consumer Protection Act, 2019

----------------------------------------------------------

Before: Mr. D.R. Thakur, President.

Mrs. Vijay Lamba , Member

Mrs. Neelam Gupta, Member

For Complainants : Shri Vaibhabh Chauhan, Adv.,

Opposite parties are exparte.

O R D E R :- Per Mr. D.R. Thakur, President.

The facts, in brief , are that opposite

parties have built 1,2 and 3 bedroom apartments on

one side of the hill on the road going to Kanda from

Dharampur and are also developing the project

named “EkjapSamridhi” in Village Anji, Dharampur

##PAGE2##

Ravneet Singh & anr. Vs Himalayan Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd.

2

District Solan, HP. Opposite parties had planned to

develop cottages in which opposite parties were

offering plots measuring 300 sq.yds with a built up

cottage of two bedrooms, hall and kitchen

measuring 700 sq.ft at a price of Rupees 60 Lac

plus charges for common amenities like electric sub

station, sewage treatment plant etc. and registration

charges. Opposite parties also offered to build

cottages as per requirements and design of

individual owners. In the second half of 2020 the

son-in-law and daughter of complainants visited

Dharampur in search of suitable property and met

opposite parties. Opposite parties showed them

existing apartments, location of which was liked by

them and they proceeded to book the land of one

bedroom apartment for them. On return to Delhi

son-in-law of complainants, Shri Manbir Singh

Grewal informed them about plans to develop

another property at Anji Village , Dharampur, with

cottages, and pursuant to which opposite parties

contacted opposite parties No.1 and 2. Opposite

party No.1 met complainants at Delhi and explained

the cottage project “EkjapSamrudhi” in which

complainants No.1 and 2 could get a cottage of their

##PAGE3##

Ravneet Singh & anr. Vs Himalayan Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd.

3

own layout and elevation design. Opposite party

No.1 further promised to hand over possession by

Diwali, 2021. Opposite parties asked for a booking

amount of Rupees 5 Lac to which complainants

agreed and on very day handed over a cheque of

Rupees 2 Lac. Thereafter complainants made a trip

to Dharampur in October/November 2020 to visit

the project site and met opposite parties for

registration of ownership of land and cottage and

completion of project in a time bond manner to

which opposite parties gave assurance to hand over

the cottage by Diwali 2021. Complainants made

further payment of Rupees 3 Lac by cheque to

opposite parties on 11-11-2020. Opposite

parties had agreed that they will design cottage as

per the requirement of complainant in corner plot

adjoining a pine tree forest. Complainants and

opposite parties had visited Solan to meet

Architecture Mr. Gupta to finalise the lay out and

complainant also met with one Ms. Rhea, a resident

of Bangalore, who was the close associate of

opposite parties. In mid of 2021 second phase of

covid struck and project started getting delayed.

Even after covid restrictions were lifted, the work on

##PAGE4##

Ravneet Singh & anr. Vs Himalayan Dreams Villas Pvt. Ltd.

4

‘EkjapSamrudhi project

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top