Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Appellant
Versus
NEERAJ KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint of bribery (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. preservation of cdrs (Para 4) |
| 3. fair trial rights (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. interlocutory nature (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 5. petition dismissed (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
ORDER :
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “CrPC”) [now Section 438 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “BNSS”)], challenging the order dated 12th July, 2023 (hereinafter “impugned order”) passed by the learned Special Judge (PC Act), Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter “Trial Court”), whereby, the learned Trial Court directed the preservation of Call Detail Records (hereinafter “CDR”) and location data of CBI officials and independent witnesses in connection with FIR No. RC-DAI-2022-A-0032, registered u
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
