SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2750

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SH. SANJAY KOHLI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SH. HARISH KUMAR KOHLI & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
SHANTNU AGGARWAL

ORDER

CM APPL. 40932/2024 [Exemption from filing typed copies of Annexures]

1. Allowed, subject to the Appellant filing legible /typed copies of the annexures within four weeks.

RFA 445/2024

2. The present Appeal impugns the Judgment and Decree dated 03.06.2024 passed by the learned Trial Court, North-West, Rohini Court Complex, Delhi in CSDJ/1451/2018 [hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Judgment”] which has dismissed the suit filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff.

3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the Impugned Judgment is premises itself on two grounds. Firstly, that the suit is barred for non-rejoinder of necessary parties and secondly, it is contended that the learned Trial Court erroneously held that the relinquishment deeds which are executed by the sisters of the Appellant do not stand proved in view of the fact that no official witness from the Sub-Registrar office was examined.

4. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that so far as concerns the issue of non-rejoinder of the sisters of the Appellant, the said sisters have executed separate relinquishment deeds on 27.05.2002 and 12.03.2015. The said relinquishment deeds were duly registered before the office

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top