SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 200

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA, J
MR. SANDIP VINODKUMAR PATEL & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STCI FINANCE LTD & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
DEVIKA MOHAN

ORDER

CRL.M.A. 18459/2024 in CRL.M.C. 4859/2024 CRL.M.A. 18468/2024 in CRL.M.C. 4861/2024 CRL.M.A. 18471/2024 in CRL.M.C. 4862/2024 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4859/2024, CRL.M.A. 18458/2024 CRL.M.C. 4861/2024, CRL.M.A. 18467/2024 CRL.M.C. 4862/2024, CRL.M.A. 18470/2024

1. The aforesaid petitions have been preferred by the respective petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of criminal complaints bearing No.7054/2023; 10565/2023 and 5560/2023 each titled as “STCI Finance Ltd. v. Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. & Ors.”, arising out of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which are pending before the learned MM.

2. The petitioners lay challenge to the impugned order 07.02.2024 in the criminal complaints bearing No.7054/2023 and 10565/2023 as also the impugned order dated 28.02.2024 in criminal complaint No.5560/2023, whereby on taking cognizance of the offence, summons have been issued.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has urged that the petitioners are independent directors who have been appointed in terms of Section 149(4) of Compani

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top