SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9061

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJAT DILWALI – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR SINGH & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
RAGHAV KACKER

O R D E R

% 05.08.2024 I.A. 5267/2023(for exemption from filing fair typed copies of dim annexures)

1. The registry will inform the defendants with respect to the dim annexures within two weeks.

2. Defendants shall thereafter file legible and clearer copies of the dim annexures, compliant with practice rules, before the next date of hearing.

3. With the aforesaid direction, the application stands disposed of.

I.A. 5266/2023 (by defendants under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC)

4. Issue notice.

5. Learned counsel for the plaintiff accepts notice on behalf of the plaintiff. Reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed four weeks thereafter.

CS(OS) 616/2022 Page 1 of 12 I.A. 18146/2022 (by plaintiff seeking a decree in default), I.A. 22179/2022 (by defendants for condoning the delay of 28 days in filing leave to defend) & I.A. 21526/2022 (by plaintiff seeking clarification qua order dated

18.10.2022)

6. The plaintiff has filed I.A. No. 18146/2022 under Order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) seeking a decree in default against the defendants. Submissions on behalf of Plaintiff

7. The learned counsel for the plaintiff contends that in pursuance to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top