JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. Petitioner impugns condition at Serial No. 9 in Schedule I of the National Company Law Tribunal (Recruitment, Salary and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Officers and other Employees) Rules, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), issued by Respondent No.1, to the extent that they prescribe a degree in law as a qualification for an Assistant to be promoted to the post of Court Officer in Respondent No. 3, National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the NCLT).

2. Petitioner joined the Registrar of Companies, Delhi as a Lower Division Clerk on 30.10.1987 and thereafter she was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk at the Company Law Board (CLB for short) on deputation basis on 18.02.1991. She was promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk on regular basis in the CLB on 03.01.2008. She was subsequently promoted to the post of Assistant on regular basis in the CLB on 28.02.2014.

3. On 25.10.2016, Petitioner applied for being appointed to post of Court Officer in NCLT, New Delhi Bench on deputation basis. By Office Order dated 25.01.2017 passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Petitioner along with other officers and employees were transferred to NCLT with effect from 01.06.2016 in terms of Section 466 read with Section 418(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.

4. Petitioner was thereafter asked to appear for an interview before the Selection Committee. On 09.03.2017, the Competent Authority of NCLT selected the petitioner for the post of Court Officer in NCLT, New Delhi Bench on deputation basis in the Pay Band (PB-2) of Rs. 9300-34800 + GP Rs. 4800 (Level-8) initially for a period of 1 year from the date of assumption of charge of post.

5. By Office Order dated 28.11.2017 Petitioner was reverted back to the post of Assistant. However, by the same Office Order Petitioner was assigned to look after the charge of the Court Officer but without payment of any extra renumeration.

6. On 21.01.2020, Respondent No. 1 notified the impugned Rules, which prescribed that the post of Court Officer would be filled by 100% promotion from the feeder post of Senior Legal Assistant with 2 years regular service in Level 7 of Pay Matrix or from the post of Assistant, with a degree in law and 6 years regular service in Level 6 in Pay Matrix. The Rules further prescribed that in case of deputation/absorption to the same post, a degree in law was “preferable”.

7. On 26.06.2020, the Deputy Registrar, NCLT New Delhi made a request to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for grant of one time relaxation to the Petitioner in terms of Rule 16 (Power to Relax) in the notified Recruitment Rules. The request was made for relaxation for promotion of the Petitioner in the feeder cadre of Assistant to the post of Court Officer without insisting on a degree of law as a precondition. 8. Thereafter vide letter dated 04.08.2020, the President of NCLT also requested the MCA to relax the eligibility criteria of having a law degree for the post of Court Officer, only in the case of the Petitioner.

9. On 23.10.2020, MCA informed NCLT that it had nominated 2 officials as members of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC for short) for selection of candidates for appointment under promotion quota in NCLT and pursuant to this; the NCLT issued an advertisement on 17.08.2020, inviting applications for various posts including the post of Court Officer for appointment on deputation basis.

10. Vide letter dated 24.11.2020, MCA responded to the recommendations by the Deputy Registrar and President, NCLT and enquired about any other such cases pending in NCLT, where employees transferred from erstwhile CLB to NCLT had become ineligible for promotion on notification of the impugned Rules, but were otherwise eligible for promotion.

11. In response to this query, the Joint Registrar of NCLT wrote a letter dated 03.12.2020 confirming that the Petitioner was the only such case transferred from the CLB who was in the zone of conside