JUDGMENT

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

1. Vide this petition, petitioners are seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari directing the respondents to quash the Gazette Notifications issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs for the years 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 to the extent it applies to Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) in respect of combined Central Police Forces (CPFs) recruitment examination wherein it is stipulated that the inter se seniority amongst direct recruits, shall be determined by adding together the marks obtained by them in Central Police Forces (Assistant Commandants) Examination conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC); in the foundation course in the BSF Academy; and the professional training course conducted by the Academy in the ratio of 50:10:40. In addition, quashing of Revised Seniority Lists dated 31.12.2015 and 10.03.2016 issued by the respondents with the modified criteria is also sought.

2. Petitioners claim to have joined CISF in the rank of Assistant Commandant in different years ranging from 2003 till 2011. Petitioners are aggrieved of unsettling their seniority vide Revised Seniority Lists dated 31.12.2015 and 10.03.2016 issued by the respondents.

3. According to petitioners, Para-8 of the Gazette Notification dated 10.05.2003 notified that the criterion of seniority amongst the direct recruits shall be determined by adding together the marks obtained by them in Central Police Forces (Assistant Commandants) Examination conducted by the UPSC in the foundation courses; in the BSF Academy and the professional training course conducted by the academy of the respective Force in the ratio of 50:10:40.

4. Pursuant thereto other Central Police Forces (CPFs), excluding the CISF, modified their Recruitment Rules and seniority of Assistant Commandants was regulated as per merit list prepared upon the total marks obtained in the ratio of 50:10:40. However, in CISF no amendment was carried out to the recruitment rules to amalgamate the above-mentioned criterion. No foundation course was ever conducted by the CISF and so, 10% marks allotted for such a course could not be interpolated by the respondents. Also the professional training to the newly inducted Commandants at the Academy of CISF was also a qualifying training only. Accordingly, CISF Seniority List was prepared on the basis of marks achieved as per the Merit List of UPSC Examination only, which was the sole basis for establishing inter se seniority of newly inducted Assistant Commandants.

5. According to petitioners, the basis to prepare the Seniority List in CISF is DoPT O.M. dated 03.07.1986, further revised by DoPT vide O.M. dated 11.11.2010, which stipulates that the seniority of all direct recruits is determined by the order of merit in which they are appointed after the recommendations of the UPSC.

6. In the year 2018, a writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 8070/2014 challenging the Seniority Lists dated 31.12.2010, 30.06.2013 and September 2014 issued by CISF was filed praying that the seniority lists should have been prepared on the basis of marks obtained in ratio of 50:10:40 in the UPSC examination, foundation course and professional training, as per the Gazette Notification of 2007. According to petitioners, they were not a party to the said petition and the respondent-

CISF did not challenge petitioners' contention therein.

7. This Court vide order dated 06.05.2015 in W.P. (C) No. 8070/2014 directed the respondents to issue revised seniority list in terms of Gazette Notification of the year 2007. Thereafter, respondents issued seniority list dated 31.12.2015 revising inter se seniority of Assistant Commandants appointed in the CAPF Examination of the year 2007.

8. Thereafter, the respondents floated a proposal dated 14.01.2016 to carry out amendment in the Recruitment Rules for preparing the seniority list based upon the marks obtained in the UPSC Examination and professional training course in the ratio of 50:50. A seniority li