SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 4612

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SATISH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

C.M. No. 30455/2023 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 150/2023 & C.M. No. 30454/2023 (stay)

3. By this revision petition, the Petitioner assails an order dated 02.03.2023 passed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filed by the Petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Petitioner herein is the Defendant before the Trial Court while the Respondent is the Plaintiff and parties hereinafter are referred to by their litigating status before the Trial Court.

4. Narrative of facts as captured in the revision petition is that Defendant is a Proprietorship concern carrying on the activity of interior designing and renovation work of constructed properties. In June, 2021 Defendant approached the Plaintiff for interiors and renovation work of his property and after initial negotiations and discussions, an estimated price was worked out between the parties for the entire project. However, after some work was carried out the parties fell apart and Plaintiff sent a legal notice dated 23.11.2021 to the Defendant demanding the alleged outstanding amounts due to the Plaintiff. Failing to receive the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top