HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SATISH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)
C.M. No. 30455/2023 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
C.R.P. 150/2023 & C.M. No. 30454/2023 (stay)
3. By this revision petition, the Petitioner assails an order dated 02.03.2023 passed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filed by the Petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Petitioner herein is the Defendant before the Trial Court while the Respondent is the Plaintiff and parties hereinafter are referred to by their litigating status before the Trial Court.
4. Narrative of facts as captured in the revision petition is that Defendant is a Proprietorship concern carrying on the activity of interior designing and renovation work of constructed properties. In June, 2021 Defendant approached the Plaintiff for interiors and renovation work of his property and after initial negotiations and discussions, an estimated price was worked out between the parties for the entire project. However, after some work was carried out the parties fell apart and Plaintiff sent a legal notice dated 23.11.2021 to the Defendant demanding the alleged outstanding amounts due to the Plaintiff. Failing to receive the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.