J U D G M E N T

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugns the order dated 27.10.2023 passed by the District Judge, Commercial Court- 03, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (‘Commercial Court’) in CS (COMM) No. 485/2021, titled as ‘Suman Jain v. Buckbox Technologies Pvt. Ltd.’ whereby the Commercial Court has dismissed the Petitioner’s application seeking de-exhibition of documents, with costs of Rs. 3,500/- payable to the Respondent.

1.1. The Petitioner is the defendant and the Respondent is the plaintiff. The suit has been filed seeking recovery of Rs. 23,08,927/- (i.e., principal of Rs. 20,52,380/- + interest of Rs. 2,56,547/-) along with pendente lite and future interest.

2. Mr. Sumit Jain has entered appearance on behalf of the Respondent. He states that he has been duly authorised by Power of Attorney dated

21.09.2023 to represent the Respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has relied upon the submissions recorded in the previous order dated 07.11.2023. He states that the documents in questions were disallowed by the Commercial Court vide order dated 25.03.2023 and therefore, the Respondent ill