SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3596

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BACARDI AND COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BAHETY OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

% 12.11.2021

1. The plaintiff is a well-known manufacturer of alcoholic beverages. It manufactures and sells rum-based beverages, mixed with various fruit essences, under the name “BREEZER”.

2. The defendants also manufacture fruit-based beverages, which are, however, non-alcoholic. The defendants manufacture and clear its beverages under the mark “FREEZ Mix”.

3. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants’ product infringes the plaintiff’s registered trademarks. The present suit, at the instance of the plaintiff, therefore, seeks an injunction against the defendants’

product.

4. The suit is presently pending before this court, awaiting completion of pleadings. The defendants have neither filed any written statement in response to the plaint nor any reply to IA 12323/2021, preferred by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), despite lapse of the time granted therefor. Both sides were permitted to file written submissions. I may note, however, that the written submissions of the defendants, which runs into 41 pages, is actually a para-wise written statement in response to the plaint. Be that as it may, I have heard learned Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top