2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 14103
DELHI HIGH COURT
YOGESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
CRL.A.-452/2009
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2023/DHC/000720
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2023/DHC/000721
CRL. A. 451/2009 & 452/2009
Page 1 of 4
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 17.01.2023
Pronounced on: 02.02.2023
+
CRL. A. 451/2009
DINESH KUMAR
...Appellant
Through:
Mr.
Archit
Upadhayay,
Advocate (DHCLSC) and Ms.
Charu Sharma, Advocates.
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
...Respondent
Through:
Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar,
APP for State
+
CRL. A. 452/2009
YOGESH KUMAR
...Appellant
Through:
Mr.
Archit
Upadhayay,
Advocate (DHCLSC) and Ms.
Charu Sharma, Advocates.
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
...Respondent
Through:
Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar,
APP for State
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
JUDGMENT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
1.
The present appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (“Cr.P.C.”) have been filed by appellants against the
Digitally Signed
By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN
Signing Date:06.02.2023
18:25:26
Signature Not Verified
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2023/DHC/000720
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2023/DHC/000721
CRL. A. 451/2009 & 452/2009
Page 2 of 4
judgment dated 23.05.2009 and order on sentence dated 26.05.2009
passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, New
Delhi in case FIR bearing no. 702/2005, registered at Police Station
Dabri, New Delhi.
2.
The above-captioned appeals were admitted and the sentences
of appellants were suspended vide order dated 05.06.2009 by this
Court.
3.
Briefly stated, the case of prosecution, before the learned Trial
Court, was that on 05.10.2005 at around 9:30 AM, when the
complainant Bhagirath and his son Jaswant were passing by a store in
Sagarpur to catch a bus for Paharganj, Delhi, two persons i.e. the
appellants herein had come on a motorcycle, parked the same in front
of the complainant, and had taken out an iron rod from the
motorcycle and started hitting the complainant on his legs. As a
result, the complainant had fallen down and when his son had made
efforts to save the complainant, he too was hit on the head by the
appellants with iron rod. It was further alleged that after hitting
mercilessly, appellants had left the spot and complainant was brought
to hospital by his son Jaswant. Initially, FIR bearing no. 702/2005
was registered against the appellants and other co-accused for the
offences punishable under Sections 308/34 of IPC. Thereafter, after
completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed and Sections
341/323/120B of IPC were added.
4.
The learned Trial Court, vide judgment dated 23.05.2009,
convicted the appellants under Sections 325/34 of IPC and sentenced
them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of
Digitally Signed
By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN
Signing Date:06.02.2023
18:25:26
Signature Not Verified
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2023/DHC/000720
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2023/DHC/000721
CRL. A. 451/2009 & 452/2009
Page 3 of 4
Rs. 5,000/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple
imprisonment for three months.
5.
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants, upon
instructions, submits that the appellants do not propose to assail the
impugned judgment on merits and would like to confine the
submissions in these appeals, to the point of sentence alone. It is
stated that since the incident in the present case is 17 years old, the
sentence of the appellants be reduced to the period already undergone
by them.
6.
This Court has heard the parties and perused the material on
record.
7.
In the present case, the incident had taken place on 05.10.2005
and the appellants were convicted by the learned Trial Court on
23.05.2009, whereby they were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment
for a period of three (03) years along with fine. The fine imposed
upon the appellants had already been deposited by them. As per the
Nominal Roll, both the appellants had remained in Judicial Custody
for about 1 month and 26 days, and their conduct