2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 19631
DELHI HIGH COURT
RUSHALI KHERA – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(CRL)-1771/2022
Neutral Citation Number is 2023/DHC/001599
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment delivered on:03.03.2023
+
W.P.(CRL) 1771/2022
RUSHALI KHERA
..... Petitioner
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
& ORS.
..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner
: Ms. Ankita Priya and Mr. Akhil Sharma,
Advs.
For the Respondents
: Ms. Sonal Chauhan and Mr. Nishant
Chauhan, Advs. for Mr. Sachin Mittal, ASC.
SI Jeetendra Singh, PS – Mahendra Park.
Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel,
DDA with Mr. Arkaj and Ms. Shilpa Dewan,
Advs. for R-4 / DDA.
Mr. Sahil Sharma and Mr. Rakesh Wadhwa,
Advs. for R- 4 and 5.
CORAM
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
JUDGMENT
1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following
reliefs:
Digitally Signed
By:KAMALDEEP KAUR
Signing Date:03.03.2023
19:45:53
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number is 2023/DHC/001599
2.
Petitioner claims that the respondents, through illegal and
fraudulent means, have made false and fabricated documents. It is
claimed that Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 in connivance with DDA,
executed a registered Conveyance Deed dated 16.09.2014 (hereinafter
‘the impugned deed’) of the property bearing No. C-53, First Floor,
New Sabji Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi 110033 (hereinafter ‘the disputed
property’) in their favour.
3.
Petitioner claims that he was in possession of the disputed
property for almost 35 years but has been dispossessed by Respondents
Nos. 5 and 6, who are claiming to be the owners (on the basis of the
impugned deed).
4.
Petitioner filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act
against the Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 for recovery of possession of the
disputed property. The respondents filed a written statement and relied
upon the alleged forged documents, in support of their possession over
the disputed property. It is pointed out that the petitioner has also filed
Digitally Signed
By:KAMALDEEP KAUR
Signing Date:03.03.2023
19:45:53
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number is 2023/DHC/001599
an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C., alleging forgery, which is
pending consideration before the learned Trial Court.
5.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Respondent
No. 4/DDA has issued the impugned deed on the basis of the alleged
forged and fabricated documents. He further submits that a
representation dated 28th January, 2022 has been given to the Vice
Chairman of the DDA for cancellation of the Conveyance Deed dated
16.09.2014.
6.
Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has given Police
Complaint dated 11.02.2022 to the Deputy Commissioner of Police
(EOW) for registration of FIR. However, no action has been taken till
date.
7.
As noted above, the petitioner has already filed a civil suit in
relation to the possession of the disputed property and the same is
pending consideration before the concerned Civil Court. It is an
admitted fact that Respondents Nos. 5 and 6 are contesting the said suit
and have relied upon the alleged forged and fabricated documents in
support of their case.
8.
The Courts have time and again held that the remedy under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not to be invoked for the
purpose of adjudication of disputed questions of facts of such nature
which would require elaborate evidence to be adduced and may involve
the cross-examination of witnesses. Courts, while exercising
jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot annul
the registered document on the ground of fraud and misrepresentation.
The same are mixed questions of fact and law. The party always have
Digitally Signed
By:KAMALDEEP KAUR
Signing Date:03.03.2023
19:45:53
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number is 2023/DHC/001599
a remedy to approach the competent Civil Court and file an appropriate
suit for such relief.
9.
The Hon’ble Apex Court in Chairman, Grid Corporation of
Orissa Ltd