2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 14765
DELHI HIGH COURT
ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SNJ DISTILLERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. – Respondent
CS(COMM)-115/2022
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2608
CS(COMM) 115/2022 Page 1 of 55
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
CS(COMM) 115/2022 & I.A. 5427/2022
ALLIED BLENDERS AND
DISTILLERS PVT. LTD.
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. Rajiv Nayar and Mr. Akhil
Sibal, Senior Advocates with Mr. Shrawan
Chopra, Mr. Vibhav Mithal, Mr. Achyut
Tewari, Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Sanjay
Chhabra, Ms. Deboshree and Mr. Akhil
Dehlan, Advocates.
versus
SNJ DISTILLERS PRIVATE LIMITED
& ANR
...... Defendants
Through:
Mr.
Sandeep
Sethi
and
Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocates with
Mr. Kartik Seth, Ms. Shriya Gilhotra,
Ms. Garima Saxena, Mr. Sahil Nagpal and
Mr. Akshit, Advocates for D-1 and 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
JUDGEMENT
JYOTI SINGH, J.
I.A. 2712/2022 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, by Plaintiff)
I.A. 4044/2022 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 read with Section 151
CPC, by Defendants)
1.
This judgment will dispose of the application filed by the
Plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, CPC, 1908 as well as
an application filed under Order 39 Rule 4, CPC filed by the
Defendants.
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR
Signing Date:21.04.2023
12:54:09
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2608
CS(COMM) 115/2022 Page 2 of 55
2.
Present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking permanent
injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting for or on
their behalf from using, manufacturing, selling, offering for sale,
exporting, importing, distributing, advertising directly or indirectly
dealing in alcoholic beverages, especially, country spirits and Indian
Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) under the impugned mark
or
any identical/deceptively similar mark to that of Plaintiff’s trademarks
‘Officer’s Choice’, ‘Officer’s Choice Blue’ and ‘Choice’ amounting to
trademark infringement, passing off, dilution and tarnishment as well
as for delivery up, damages and rendition of accounts of profits with
costs.
3.
On 17.02.2022, Court granted ex-parte ad interim injunction
against the Defendants restraining them from using, manufacturing,
selling, etc., alcoholic beverages, especially, country spirits and IMFL
under the impugned trademark ‘Green Choice’ (label) (hereinafter
referred to as “Green Choice”) or any other mark, identical/
deceptively similar mark to Plaintiff’s trademarks ‘Officer’s Choice’,
‘Officer’s Choice Blue’ and ‘Choice’. Subsequently, an application
was filed on behalf of the Defendants under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC,
seeking vacation of the ex-parte injunction order. Pleadings being
complete in both the applications, they were taken up together for
hearing.
4.
The expose of facts, as set out in the plaint is that:-
(a)Plaintiff is in the business of manufacturing and marketing
alcoholic beverages including IMFL, sold under distinctive
trademarks OFFICER’S CHOICE, OFFICER’S CHOICE
BLUE, CLASS VODKA, STERLING RESERVE, etc. and
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR
Signing Date:21.04.2023
12:54:09
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2608
CS(COMM) 115/2022 Page 3 of 55
labels such as
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
.
(b)The Officer’s Choice trademark was coined and adopted in
the year 1988 by predecessor in rights, title and interest of
the Plaintiff and was assigned to the Plaintiff along with the
goodwill of the business by way of Deed of Assignment
dated 26.02.1991. By virtue of a demerger, transfer and
vesting of the liquor business of M/s BDA Pvt. Ltd. with
Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. under a Composite
Scheme of Arrangement approved by the Bombay High
Court on