SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 26991

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJIV SHAKDHER, AMIT BANSAL, JJ
AHUTI RAUL – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY RAUL – Respondent


Advocates:
SIDHANT SARASWAT

ORDER

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM APPL. 28031/2024 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking leave to file lengthy synopsis]

2. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant to seek permission to file a list of dates beyond the prescribed number of pages.

3. Given the reasons articulated in the application, the prayer made therein is allowed.

4. The application is, accordingly, disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2024 page 1 of 3 CM APPL. 28032/2024 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking summoning of trial court records]

5. The Registry will summon the trial court record and place it before the Court, albeit in digitized form, prior to the next date of hearing.

6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2024

7. This appeal has been preferred against the orders dated 22.04.2024, 23.04.2024 and 03.05.2024 passed by the Family Court.

8. Presently, the dispute between the parties pertains to interaction rights sought to be exercised by the respondent/father concerning the minor son, who, concededly, is differently-abled.

8.1 Evidently, the son, aged 17 years, suffers from “Autism Spectrum Disorder”.

9. The couple also has a dau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top