HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJIV SHAKDHER, AMIT BANSAL, JJ
AHUTI RAUL – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY RAUL – Respondent
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CM APPL. 28031/2024 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking leave to file lengthy synopsis]
2. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant to seek permission to file a list of dates beyond the prescribed number of pages.
3. Given the reasons articulated in the application, the prayer made therein is allowed.
4. The application is, accordingly, disposed of.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2024 page 1 of 3 CM APPL. 28032/2024 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking summoning of trial court records]
5. The Registry will summon the trial court record and place it before the Court, albeit in digitized form, prior to the next date of hearing.
6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 158/2024
7. This appeal has been preferred against the orders dated 22.04.2024, 23.04.2024 and 03.05.2024 passed by the Family Court.
8. Presently, the dispute between the parties pertains to interaction rights sought to be exercised by the respondent/father concerning the minor son, who, concededly, is differently-abled.
8.1 Evidently, the son, aged 17 years, suffers from “Autism Spectrum Disorder”.
9. The couple also has a dau
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.