SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 31518

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ASIAN HOTELS NORTH LTD – Appellant
Versus
YES BANK LTD & ORS. – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

No, this case law does not address or permit the use of the word "fraud" (or any related term) in a consumer complaint. The judgment concerns a commercial suit under the CPC involving banking loans, OTR schemes, SARFAESI proceedings, and related applications (e.g., plaint amendment, rejection, and injunction recall). It focuses on contractual disputes, lender consortium actions, RBI guidelines, and jurisdictional bars under SARFAESI/RDB Act, with no reference to consumer forums, Consumer Protection Act, or pleadings in consumer complaints. Mentions of "fraud" appear only peripherally (e.g., RBI norms for forensic audits in stressed accounts (!) , or general pleading standards in unrelated contexts [p_718-724]), but none relate to consumer complaints.


J U D G M E N T

Contents FACTUAL HISTORY ...................................................................................................... 3 I.A. No. 10671/2023 (seeking amendment of the Plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC) ......................................................................................................................... 21 SUBMISSIONS .................................................................................................................. 21 (On behalf of applicant/Plaintiff) .......................................................................................................... 21 (On behalf of the defendant No. 7/Punjab National Bank) .................................................................. 24 (On behalf of defendant No. 6/Bank of Maharashtra) ......................................................................... 25 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 29 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 86 I.A. No. 8068/2023 (seeking rejection of the original Plaint under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top