Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
AKHILESHWAR KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. robbery and conspiracy details (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's defense arguments (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent's opposition to bail (Para 4) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. bail application outcome (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
CRL.M.A. 3526/2025 (under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act, 2023 on behalf of the Applicant Akhileshwar Kumar seeking early hearing)
The application is allowed and with the consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for hearing.
BAIL APPLN. 291/2025
Brief Facts
2.1. In the FIR, it is stated that the complainant was in contact with the Applicant for several business offers and during one such conversation, the Applicant made an offer to him that he can arrange to sell him Gold, which is 30% discounted rate compared to market value and this Gold arrives in India via the Nepal route. In the FIR, the complainant identified the Applicant as Sanjay and provided three different mobile numbers on which he spoke with the Applicant.
2.3. It is stated that while the complainant was walking back to the car, two men on a pulsar motorbike came towards them and they were dressed up in the uniform of the Police
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
