J U D G M E N T

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J. :

1. This appeal brought under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure assails the judgment and decree dated 18.09.2019 whereby the money recovery suit filed by the appellant was dismissed by the court of learned Additional District Judge, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Upon service of notice, the respondent entered appearance through counsel. I heard learned counsel for both sides and examined the digitized record of the trial court.

RFA 150/2020 Page 1 of 11 pages Digitaly signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH ou=DELHI HIGH COURT, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4a fec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626ca KATHPALIAcca, postalCode=110003, st=DELHI, serialNumber=D3E86796451EC45C07B5 D15570996B40F80CBD2EEE60402C487 965FF801E26FA, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2024.10.04 02:53:03 +05'30'

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

2. Briefly stated, circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows.

2.1 The appellant, a private limited company, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 3,08,343/- against the present respondent, pleading that both parties were engaged in the business of fancy lights, wherein since the year 2012-1