SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3974

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
OPENTV INC – Appellant
Versus
THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

The present judgment consists of the following sections:

S. No. Section Page No.
1. Background 2
2. Facts 3
3. Submissions 7
4. Analysis and findings 17
5. Appendix 1: Originally Filed Claims 44
6. Appendix 2: Final Claims considered by Patent Office 47
6. Appendix 3: Alternative Claims filed before Court 51
Background

1. The Appellant is a company incorporated under the laws of United States of America with address at 275 Sacramento Street, San Francisco, California 94111, USA. The Appellant company is engaged in providing interactive and enhanced television solutions and claims to leverage its technologies and worldwide patent portfolio in providing such services and solutions.

2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant- OpenTV Inc. seeking inter alia, an order to set aside the decision dated 31st May, 2021 (hereinafter ‘impugned order’) issued by the office of the Respondent-The Controller of Patents and Designs. The impugned order refused the application for grant of a patent titled ‘System and method to provide gift media’ bearing Application No. 2564/DELNP/2012, filed on 23rd March, 2012 (hereinafter ‘subject patent’),

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top