SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 32192

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J
MOHAMMAD WASIQ NADEEM KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI – Respondent
CRL.M.C. 9475/2024



Advocates:
TARA NARULA

The court ruled that the FIR does not constitute a valid offense under the cited sections, preserving the rights of the parties without adjudicating the merits.

Headnote:(A) FIR No. 280/2024 - Sections 196, 353(2), 61 BNS, 2023 - Petition for quashing FIR alleging enmity and violence - Petitioner to participate in investigation without arrest during pendency - No adjudication on merits, rights of parties preserved. (Paras 1, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petition seeks to quash FIR No. 280/2024 regarding a video that allegedly incited violence, with the petitioner participating in the ongoing investigation.

Findings of Court:
The court directs that the petitioner shall not be arrested during the investigation and ensures no harassment occurs.

Issues: The main issue is whether the FIR under the cited sections constitutes a valid offense.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes that no offense is made out even if the respondent's contentions are accepted and that the merits of the case remain unadjudicated.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

O R D E R

1. This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 280/2024, P.S. Shaheen Bagh dated 30.11.2024 under Section 196/353(2)/61 BNS, 2023 and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. As per the FIR, a video was uploaded allegedly causing feeling of enmity and violence in local public.

3. In the present case, the investigation is ongoing and the petitioner is participating in the same.

4. Mr. Sibal, learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, states that the petitioner will continue to participate in the investigation and cooperate with the same.

5. Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) states that during the pendency of the investigation, the petitioner shall not be arrested in FIR No. 280/2024 and after investigation, if there is any requirement of custodial interrogation, the respondent shall give a notice in writing of 7 clear days to the petitioner.

6. The statement made by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) is taken on record.

7. The respondent shall ensure that under the garb of investigation, there is no harassment of the petitioner and that the investigation is concluded expeditiously.

8. The petitioner shall not leave the NCT of Delhi without permission from the competent Court in the meantime.

9. With these directions and with consent of parties, the petition is disposed of.

10. Mr. Sibal, learned Senior Counsel states that even if all the contentions of the respondent are accepted, even then no offence is made out to register the FIR under Section 196/353(2)/61 BNS, 2023 .

11. This Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the controversy raised in the petition and all rights and legal contentions of the parties are left open.

12. List on 20.12.2024 for filing a status report with regard to status of the progress of the investigation. The status report shall be given at least one day in advance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top