SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 32628

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J
MOHD. TAHIR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI – Respondent
CRL.M.C. 4654/2022 | CRL.M.A. 18837/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Tara Narula, Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Mr. Anirudh Ramanathan, Mr. Rishabh Bhati, Mr. Harshvardhan Jain
For the Respondents: Mr. Madhukar Pandey, SPP with Mr. Aviral Bansal

Two FIRs for the same incident are impermissible; subsequent FIR treated as supplementary to the first.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 154, 156, 162, 173 - Two FIRs registered for the same transaction and incident at the same premises - The Court quashed the second FIR (FIR No. 116/2020), ruling that successive FIRs for the same incident are impermissible as per established legal principles. (Paras 19, 21-22)

(B) Criminal Law - The court emphasized the importance of not allowing multiple FIRs for the same occurrence, citing judicial precedents to underline the necessity for a single FIR pertaining to a singular incident when connected offenses arise. (Paras 15-18)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contended that two FIRs arising from the same incident on 24.02.2020 were registered against him; he argued that this was contrary to the law established by the Supreme Court in prior rulings, leading to unnecessary and unjust dual prosecution for single occurrences.

Findings of Court:
The Court concluded that though both FIRs were related to the same incident, justice for victims necessitated treating FIR No. 116/2020's charge-sheet as supplementary evidence rather than quashing it outright.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the registration of two FIRs for the same incident violated legal protocols and how to reconcile the confusion resulting from such duplicates.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that based on established legal precedence, only one FIR could be registered for a single incident, and thus FIR No. 116/2020 should be quashed while allowing the charge-sheet to serve as supplementary evidence for the first FIR.

Result: The second FIR was quashed, allowing its charge-sheet to supplement the first FIR without causing prejudice to ongoing trials.

Table of Content
1. two firs registered from the same incident are impermissible. (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. arguments regarding dual prosecutions and legal implications. (Para 9 , 10)
3. the law emphasizes a single fir for distinct yet linked offenses. (Para 14 , 19)
4. application of legal precedents in determining the course of actions. (Para 15 , 18 , 21)
5. the need to balance legal rights of accused and justice for victims. (Para 22 , 24)

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR No.116/2020, dated 27.02.2020, registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas for offences under Sections 109, 114, 147, 148, 149, 392, 427, 436, 454, 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act , 1984.

2. It is the case of the Petitioner that apart from the present FIR, another FIR, being FIR No. 101/2020, dated 25.02.2020, registered at PS Khajuri Khas under sections 109, 114, 147 148, 149, 186, 353, 427, 435, 436, 454, 34 IPC and 3 and 4 PDPP Act, pertaining to the same incident which occurred on 24.02.2020 on the same premises, i.e. E-98/2, Khajuri Khas, Main Karawal Nagar Road, New Delhi, 110094 (hereinafter referred to as „the building in question‟) has been registered against the Petitioner herein. It is stated that FIR No. 101/2020 has been registered on the complaint of Constable Sangram Singh in relation to the incident occurred on 24.02.2020 at the parking situated on the ground floor of the building in question, whereas FIR No. 116/2020 has been registered at the behest of one Tejveer Singh @ Tejpal Singh in respect of the incident occurred on 24.02.2020 at “Bharat Vatika” situated on the first floor of the building in question. It is stated that FIR No.101/2020 was registered on 25.02.2020 whereas FIR No.116/2020 was registered on 27.02.2020.

3. Material on record discloses that FIR No. 101/2020 has been registered on the complaint of Constable Sangram Singh. The Statement of Constable Sangram Singh, on the basis of which FIR No.101/2020 dated 25.02.2020 has been registered, is incorporated in the FIR and the same reads as under:

“Statement of Sangram Singh (No. 2800/NE, PIS No. 28091636) S/o Shri Ram Kumar Singh R/o VPO Mitli, Distt. Bagpat, UP age 31 years, M.No. 8010578581 stated that I am posted on the post of Sepoy at police Station Khajuri Khas and deputed at Beat No. 07F Block, of this Police Station Main Khajuri Khas, Delhi. On 24.02.20 keeping in view the protest of CAA NRC I and HC Vikram No.825/NE, HC Virender No. 759/NE were deputed at Chand Bagh Puliya, E Block, Khajuri Khas Near Pradeep Ki Parking. That I parked my motorcycle No. DL 5SBW 3316 Hero Honda Hunk in the Pardeep‟s Parking and was performing my duty. A huge mob gathered on the passage going towards Sherpur Chowk and in the nearby streets and the rioters were pelting stones and arson/ putting fire there and causing harm to the private and government properties. Some people out of that mob were instigating the crowed for pelting stones and to put fire. At about 02.15 pm from the side of Chandbagh a huge mob including more number of people came there and started pelting stones and putting fire. That we all three at our level best were trying to make understand the mob and to stop them from doing this. But they were not agreed to follow our instructions. As the rioters were in huge numbers therefore it was impossible for us to control them, as the people in the mob were pelting stones and the people in the mob became more aggressive and they started throwing stones on us, we ran here and there to save our life. To save my life, I entered in the Pradeep‟s Parking. HC Vikram and HC Virender also ran from there and entered into the streets. General public also started running from here and there to save their lives. I with the help of other persons put down the shutter of the Pradeep‟s parking and went inside the parking hall and from there I went upside on 1st floor. In the meanwhile the mob became violent and they broken the sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top