HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
M/S PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION LTD – Appellant
Versus
HIMADRI SHANKAR ROY & ANR. – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J.:
CM APPL. 67537/2024 (Application under Sections 5&14, Limitation Act)
1. By way of the application under consideration, the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 4486 days in filing the appeal to assail money recovery decree. Having heard learned senior counsel for appellant at length and having perused the records, I found it not fit case to even issue notice of the application to the other side.
2. Briefly stated, the circumstances pleaded by the appellant in order to explain this inordinate delay in filing the appeal are as follows. During RFA 797/2024 Page 1 of 14 pages GIRISH Digitaly signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, ou=DELHI HIGH COURT, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65fe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d4 KATHPALIA 3 se5 rf i9 a7 lN6 u26 mc ba ecc r=a, D p 3o Es 8t 6a 7lC 9o 6d 4e 5= 11 E1 C0 40 50 C3 0, 7 s Bt= 5DD 1E 5LH 57I, 0 996B40F80CBD2EE Signature Not Verified E D6 a0 te4 :0 22 0C 24 48 .17 19 .6 25 6F 1F 48 :0 21 7E :32 76 F +A 0, 5 c '3n 0= 'GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed pendency of the suit, which culminated in the impugned judgment and decree dated 18.09.2012, counsel for the appellant (defendant no. 1 before
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.