JUDGEMENT

1. This common judgment shall decide the above-noted three separate appeals preferred by the appellant/Insurance company, each instituted under Section 30 of the Employee‘s Compensation Act, 19231 challenging the award of compensation to each of the injured workman/respondent No.1/claimants assuming 100% loss of earning capacity. The facts of the above-noted appeals present some-what similar facts raising a substantial question of law about determination of the amount of compensation in the face of apparent contradictions between the medical evidence and the assumption of loss of earning capacity by the Commissioner, Employee‘s Compensation, Delhi2. In order to avoid any confusion, this Court would briefly delve into the factual circumstances of each of the aforesaid appeals. FAO 17/2021

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is an admitted fact that the truck bearing No. HR55-P-9692 was registered in the name of respondent No.2 / registered owner, that met with an accident on 08.11.2017 at about 07.00 a.m. in the morning within the jurisdiction of PS Delhi Gate, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh near Talashpur, Aligarh bypass, as a result of which, both driver and responde