JUDGMENT

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

1. The appellant/wife has filed the present appeal against the Judgment dated 25.02.2020 vide which the Divorce Petition filed by the respondent/husband (petitioner in the divorce petition) has been allowed on the ground of „cruelty‟ under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1955’).

2. The facts in brief are that the appellant got married to the respondent according to the Hindu Rites and Customs on 30.04.2006 and one son namely master Ashwin Kumar was born from the said wedlock on 18.01.2007. The respondent/husband had claimed that the appellant was aggressive, quarrelsome and violent in nature towards him and his family members. She used to frequently leave the matrimonial home without informing him or the family members and whenever they sought an explanation, she used to quarrel. On 09.08.2008, one Sh. Om Prakash, a close relative of the respondent/husband had come to their house where the appellant misbehaved with the relative. She did so with the other relatives who used to visit their house. It was further claimed that the appellant/wife did not mend her ways despite repeated requests and r