Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JJ
MAMTA – Appellant
Versus
PRADEEP KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's aggressive behavior led to the separation. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. marriage considered as a social institution with legal implications. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. allegations and complaints impact mutual cognizance of cruelty. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. continuous separation grounds for divorce under established law. (Para 22 , 23 , 26) |
| 5. no merit found in appeal; judgment dismissed. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
1. The appellant/wife has filed the present appeal against the Judgment dated 25.02.2020 vide which the Divorce Petition filed by the respondent/husband (petitioner in the divorce petition) has been allowed on the ground of „cruelty‟ under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act , 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1955’).
2. The facts in brief are that the appellant got married to the respondent according to the Hindu Rites and Customs on 30.04.2006 and one son namely master Ashwin Kumar was born from the said wedlock on 18.01.2007. The respondent/husband had claimed that the appellant was aggressive, quarrelsome and violent in nature towards him and his family members. She used to frequently leave the matrimonial home without
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
