Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2366 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13540/2022 Date of Decision: 28.03.2023 IN THE MATTER OF:
DR. MEGHA SUGANDH D /0 MR. SHIV KUMAR SUGHANDH, R/0 C-39, ACHARYA KRPLANI ROAD, ADARSH NAGAR, DELHI-33 ..... PETITIONER Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra and Mr. Rishu Kant Sharma, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, DELHI SECRETARIAT, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002 ..... RESPONDENT NO. 1 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS VC SECTOR 16C, DWARKA NEW DELHI-110078 ..... RESPONDENT NO. 2 CHAUDHARY BRAHM PRAKASH AYURVED CHARAK SANSTHAN VILLAGE KHERA DABAR, NAJAFGARH, NEW DELHI-110073 ..... RESPONDENT NO. 3 Through: Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. Vivek Kumar and Mr. Naved Ahmed, Advocates for respondent No. 1 Ms. Anita Sahahi and Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advocates for respondent No. 2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
J U D G M E N T
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-
“a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondent No. 1 to expunge the observation made by Sub Divisional Magistrate ('SOM '), Model Town in its order bearing file no. F. NO./SDM/MT /2021/519 dated 05.02.2022 on the basis of which the SOM has cancelled EWS certificate issued to the Petitioner;
b. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the letter dated
05.08.2022 issued by Respondent No. 2;
c. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to restore the admission of the Petitioner to Respondent No. 3.
d. Pass such other or further orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 30.12.2020, the petitioner was issued a certificate of belonging to the Economically Weaker Section (hereinafter referred to as ‘EWS Certificate’) by SDM, Model Town. On the same day, the petitioner applied for a change in category from OBC to EWS at the respondent No.2-University. On 01.01.2021, the petitioner was admitted into the MD (Ayush)- Post Graduate Ayurveda Course by the respondent No.2-Univeristy. However, on 18.02.2022, the petitioner’s EWS certificate was cancelled by respondent No.1. Furthermore, on 01.09.2022 vide letter dated 05.08.2022, the admission of petitioner by respondent No.2-
University was also cancelled. Hence, the present petition.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner took an admission in the Post Graduation Ayurveda Course for the Academic Year 2020-21. According to him, the petitioner as advised by respondent No. 2-University, submitted an application to respondent No. 1 for issuance of EWS certificate. The petitioner, therefore, filed an application before the concerned SDM for surrender of her OBC certificate and also applied for the granting of an EWS certificate.
4. The concerned SDM issued an EWS certificate after thorough investigation. The petitioner applied to respondent No. 2-University seeking admission in the concerned course with a request to change category from OBC to EWS. The counselling took place and the petitioner was granted admission under the EWS category for the concerned course in the relevant Academic Year.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that some of the candidates who belonged to the EWS category, raised their grievances, stating therein that some admissions have been granted to non- deserving candidates under the EWS category. On the basis of the complaints, respondent No. 1 cancelled the EWS certificate of the petitioner pursuant thereto the respondent No. 2-University also cancelled the admission of the petitioner. He, therefore, submits that by the time, the cancellation of the EWS certificate and the admission of the petitioner took place; the petitioner was already in the second year. He further submits that it was only a three year course and two years of study was already completed by the petitioner. He further submits that the application for change of category was submitted as per advise by the respondent No. 2-University and, therefore, if the petitioner has bonafidely filed the application the same should not be the reason to disallow her in completion of the entire course. He, therefore, submits that under the facts of the present case, when the petitioner has already a studied for two years and if her admission is cancelled at this stage, the same would not be in the interest of justice. According to him, the petitioner also undertakes not to accept any stipend, if she is allowed to complete the course.
6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 opposed the prayer and submitted that once the petitioner herself has given the application
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.