2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 19382
DELHI HIGH COURT
SMT SAVITA SARDANA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SATISH PAUL & ORS. – Respondent
EX.P.-50/2021
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2040
EX.P. 50/2021
Page 1 of 20
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Order reserved on: 20 March 2023
Order pronounced on: 23 March 2023
+
EX.P. 50/2021
SMT SAVITA SARDANA
..... Decree Holder
Through:
Mr. D. Verma, Adv.
versus
SMT. SATISH PAUL & ORS.
..... Judgement Debtors
Through:
Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Adv.
for J.D. Nos. 1 & 3.
Ms. Neha Sharma, Adv. for
J.D. Nos. 2 to 4
Mr. Ashim Vachher, Mr. P.
Piyush and Mr. Kunal Lakra,
Advs. for Objectors.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA
O R D E R
EX.APPL.(OS) 390/2022(Objection)
1.
By means of the instant order, the Court proceeds to decide the
instant objections which have been preferred purporting to be
referable to Rules 90 and 97 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 19081.
2.
The present execution proceedings have been instituted in
respect of a final decree of partition dated 05 November 2019.
Undisputedly, the aforesaid judgement and decree has attained finality
1 Code
Digitally Signed
By:NEHA
Signing Date:23.03.2023
17:23:50
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2040
EX.P. 50/2021
Page 2 of 20
since parties to the aforesaid proceedings have neither questioned nor
assailed the aforesaid decree.
3.
As per the disclosures made in the objections, it is the case of
the Objector that the property bearing number R-496, New Rajinder
Nagar, New Delhi2 was originally applied for being allotted in the
name of late Shri Ram Bheja Mal as a displaced person in lieu of
properties left behind by him and his family members in Pakistan after
partition. It is the case of the Objector that the application itself was
made by the late Shri Ram Bheja Mal for the benefit of himself as
well as his family members. The objections further disclose that the
late Shri Ram Bheja Mal expired prior to the allotment of the said
property in his name. He is stated to be survived by three sons namely
late Shri Prakash Chandra Khetarpal, late Shri Jagdish Chander Paul
and late Shri Ramesh Chander Paul. Thethree surviving sons, it is
asserted, jointly contributed funds to acquire the said Rajinder Nagar
property. It may be noted at this stage itself that the Objectors are the
son and daughter of the late Shri Ramesh Chander Paul. However and
undisputedly, the perpetual lease deed in respect of the said property
came to be executed and made in favour of the Late Shri Jagdish
Chander Paul.
4.
The Objectors further aver that after allotment, money was
contributed by all three brothers for the purposes of construction of
the property which stands in place over the allotted plot. It is further
averred that the late Shri Ramesh Chander Paul was in joint
2 suit property
Digitally Signed
By:NEHA
Signing Date:23.03.2023
17:23:50
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2040
EX.P. 50/2021
Page 3 of 20
possession with the other two brothers, namely, the late Shri Prakash
Chander Khetarpal and late Shri Jagdish Chander Paul.
5.
It is further averred that the late Shri Ramesh Chander Paul who
was serving as an officer in the Ministry of External Affairs of the
Union Government used to be posted out of India. However,
according to the Objectors, he always retained possession of the first
floor of the suit property. It is also asserted that the late Shri Ramesh
Chander Paul right from the time when the property was originally
constructed in 1962 held himself out to be the exclusive owner of the
first floor of the suit property. It is further disclosed that upon retiring
from service on 30 November 1981, the late Shri Ramesh Chander
Paul along with his wife, the late Smt. Sudharshan Paul and the
Objectors shifted into the first floor of the suit property on 05 October
1981 and continued to occupy the same without interruption and the
late Shri R