2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 12683
DELHI HIGH COURT
ROMIL GUPTA TRADING AS SOHAN LAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS & ANR. – Respondent
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM)-1/2023 2023:DHC:5129
$~7 & 8
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 24thJuly, 2023
+
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 1/2023 and I.A. 1530/2023, 1532/2023
ROMIL GUPTA TRADING AS SOHAN LAL
GUPTA
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Shubhie
Wahi, Ms. Ankita Seth and Mr. Amit
Singh, Advocates (M: 8825116948).
versus
REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Mr Vipin Wason,
Mr Avinsh Sharma and Ms Stuti
Wason,
Advocates
(M:
8010903234).
Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar,
CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra,
Mr.
Sagar
Mehlawat
and
Mr.
Alexander
Mathai
Paikaday,
Advocates (M: 9810788606).
8
WITH
+
W.P.(C)-IPD 10/2023
LANDMARK CRAFTS PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Mr Vipin Wason,
Mr Avinsh Sharma and Ms Stuti
Wason,
Advocates
(M:
8010903234).
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
& ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Shubhie
Digitally Signed
By:RAHUL
Signing Date:26.07.2023
14:43:12
Signature Not Verified
Wahi, Ms. Ankita Seth and Mr. Amit
Singh,
Advocates
for
R-3
(M:
8825116948).
Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SPC for UOI, R-
4 (M: 8527486543).
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1.
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2.
The
present
petitions
relate
to
Appellant’s
mark
which has been rectified/cancelled by the Respondent No. 1-
Registrar of Trade Marks vide impugned order dated 15th December, 2022.
The said impugned order was stayed by this Court vide order dated 25th
January, 2023. The said order reads as follows:
which is presently pending. Mr. Rao argues that
during the pendency of rectification proceedings,
there was no basis for the Deputy Registrar to
invoke suo moto powers under Section 57(4) of the
Act
to
cancel
Appellant's
mark.
Digitally Signed
By:RAHUL
Signing Date:26.07.2023
14:43:12
Signature Not Verified
14. For the reasons noted above, it is directed that
till the next date of hearing, the impugned order
dated 15thDecember, 2022, shall remain stayed and
Appellant's mark under application No. 3986970 is
restored on the register”.
3.
The Writ Petition bearing no. W.P.(C)-IPD 10/2023 has been filed by
Landmark
Crafts
Private
Limited,
seeking
early
disposal
of
rectification/cancellation which has been filed under Section 57 of the Trade
Marks Act, 1999 before the Respondent No. 1- Registrar of Trademarks.
4.
After hearing some submissions, it emerges that the following four
proceedings are pending between the different parties:
i)
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 1/2023 titled Romil Gupta Trading as
Sohan Lal Gupta v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.
ii)
W.P.(C)-IPD 10/2023 titled Landmark Crafts Private Limited
Digitally Signed
By:RAHUL
Signing Date:26.07.2023
14:43:12
Signature Not Verified
v. Union of India Through Its Secretary & Anr.
iii)
CS (COMM) 117/2019 titled M/s Landmark Crafts Private
Limited v. M/s Sohan Lal Gupta through its Proprietor Sh. Romil
Gupta before the ld. ADJ (Commercial Court) Karkardooma Court.
iv)
Rectification Application 266607 titled Romil Gupta Trading
as M/s Sohan Lal Gupta v. Landmark Crafts Private Limited before
the Registrar of Trade Marks.
5.
A coordinate bench of this Court in Jumeirah Beach Resort LLC v.
Designarch Consultants Pvt. Ltd. (C.O (COMM-IPD-TM) 124/2022, order
dated 28thNovember 2022) considering the issue of consolidation of
proceedings under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and IP
Division Rules, 2022 observed as follows:
Digitally Signed
By:RAHUL
Signing Date:26.07.2023
14:43:12
Signature Not Verified
Confusion is bound to result if the infringement
and passing off suit filed by Jumeirah against
Designarch,
and
the
rectification/removal
proceedings
instituted
by
Jumeirah
against
Designarch before the IPAB are taken up by this
Court
and
the
counter
proceedings
for
removal/rectification
instituted
by
Designarch
against Jumeirah pending before the learned
Registrar of Trademarks are allowed to c