Certainly! Please provide the legal document content you'd like me to analyze, and I'll generate the key points with the appropriate references as specified.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 226/2019 Page 1 of 16

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Reserved on: 18^th July , 2023

Pronounced on: 23^rd August, 2023

+

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 226/2019

VASU BAJAJ

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Ankur Mahindra, Mr. Ankush

Satija and Mr. Aditya Kapur,

Advocates.

versus

RAKESH BAJAJ

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr. Kamal Kumar, Mr. Rakesh

Bajaj and Mr. Savyasachi Rawat,

Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

1.

This is a case that clamours for the exercise of judicial conscience

to address the conundrum of whether an individual‟s right to recover

stipulated in section 125(3) Cr.P.C. It warrants our endeavour to

determine whether the jurisprudential principle of Ubi jus ibiremedium

which posits that every right has a commensurate remedy stands true when

it is confronted with the letter of the law i.e. Section 125 Cr.P.C in this

instance.

DigitallySigned By:SAHIL

SHARMA

Signing Date:23.08.2023

14:33:56

Signat