SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3054

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SAIMUL HODA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ANU MALHOTRA, J.

1. The applicant, vide the present application seeks the grant of bail in relation to FIR No.189/2017, PS Crime Branch, New Delhi under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 submitting inter alia to the effect:-

• that he has been incarcerated since 15.11.2019;

• that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case;

• that two other co-accused persons namely Samir Tantubai and Manoj Hari who were the main and only beneficiaries, have already been granted bail;

• that the charge sheet in the matter has been filed;

• that the applicant was not even named in the main charge sheet;

• that the matter is at the stage of evidence and in the prevailing pandemic, the trial would take time;

• that the applicant has clean antecedents and has never been convicted previously and that he has been falsely implicated in other unsolved FIRs;

• that the applicant’s father is aged more than 87 years and suffers from acute spinal injury, and had met with an accident and is confined to bed;

• that the younger daughter of the applicant aged 5 years suffers from kidney disease and that both the father and daughter of the applicant need proper care, attention and presence of the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top