HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA, JJ
VIKRANT KHANNA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. AMITA LAMBA & ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present appeal has been filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant under Section 10(1) of the Delhi High Court Act , 1966 read with Section 104 and Order XLVIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 challenging the impugned order dated 10th January, 2023, passed by the ld. Single Judge. By the impugned order, the ld. Single Judge permitted the written statement of the Defendant/Respondent to be taken on record, subject to payment of Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the Plaintiff/Appellant.
Background
3. The suit from which the present appeal emanates is one for recovery of a sum of Rs.7,95,38,338/- filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant against the Defendants/Respondents. The brief facts of the case are that on 30th October, 2021 an advance copy of the plaint was served to the Defendant/Respondent, and on 26th November, 2021 summons were issued to the Defendant/Respondent by the ld. Single Judge. On 11th March, 2022 the Plaintiff/Appellant was directed to file certain documents including certain bills/vouchers, and the Defendant/Respondent was directed to file the written statement after four weeks from supply of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.