SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 24717

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
RESHU AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
KAPIL AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
HARSH VARDHAN SHARMA

ORDER

1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.A. 9304/2024

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.

4. The delay of 64 days in filing the petition stands condoned.

5. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.REV.P. 408/2024

6. The present petition is filed under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, inter alia, challenging the order dated 07.10.2023 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’), passed by the learned Family Court, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in MT Case No. 136/2023.

7. The learned Family Court, by the impugned order, had dismissed the application for interim maintenance filed by the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner has concealed material facts and had not disclosed that she had been earning immediately before marriage.

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still not earning any amount. He submits that the ITR returns which had been relied upon by the learned Family Court were for the period prior to the year of marriage between the parties, that is, 2020.

9. He submits that the same could not have been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top