SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 25685

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
ASHOK SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(CRL) 1666/2024



Advocates:
NITIN GOEL

An order of suspension of arms license is an appealable order under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959.

Headnote:

Arms Act - Suspension of Arms License - Section 18

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the order passed by the respondent no. 1 dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 against the order-cum-show cause notice dated 27.10.2020, passed by the Joint Commissioner of Police, suspending the Arms license of the petitioner with immediate effect.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the respondent no. 1 clearly erred in not exercising the jurisdiction vested in him under Section 18 of the Arms Act, on an incorrect presumption that it is only the final order which can be challenged in an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act. The court observed that an appeal against the order of suspension is also maintainable under Section 18 of the Arms Act.

Issues: Whether an appeal against the order of suspension of arms license is maintainable under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959?

Ratio Decidendi: Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 provides that any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority suspending or revoking a license may prefer an appeal against that order to the appellate authority. The court held that even an order of suspension of arms license is an appealable order under Section 18 of the Arms Act.

Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned order and restored the appeal of the petitioner before the respondent no. 1, directing the respondent no. 1 to expedite the adjudication of the appeal in accordance with law.

ORDER

% 24.05.2024 CRL.M.A. 16221/2024 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(CRL) 1666/2024 & CRL.M.A. 16220/2024

2. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.P.C.’), challenging the order dated 28.02.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’) passed by the respondent no.1 in Case No.90/2023 titled as Shri Ashok Solanki v. Joint Commissioner of Police, whereby the learned respondent no. 1 has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 (in short, ‘Arms Act’).

3. The above appeal was preferred by the petitioner against the order-cum-show cause notice dated 27.10.2020, passed by the Joint Commissioner of Police, Licensing Unit, Police Station: Defence Colony, New Delhi, suspending the Arms license of the petitioner with immediate effect, while asking him to show-cause why the same be not cancelled. The petitioner was also directed to deposit the licensed weapon to the nearest police station.

4. The appeal has been dismissed by the respondent no. 1, observing as under:

    “In view of the above, I am of the considered opinion that the present appeal is pre-mature as no final order has yet been passed by the Licensing Authority in the matter. The appeal is therefore dismissed accordingly. However, the licensing authority is directed to take a final decision expeditiously.”

5. Issue notice.

6. Notice is accepted by Mr.Amol Sinha, the learned ASC (Criminal).

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent no.1 has clearly erred in not exercising the jurisdiction vested in him under Section 18 of the Arms Act, on an incorrect presumption that it is only the final order which can be challenged in an appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act. He submits an appeal against the order of suspension is also maintainable.

8. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that, in spite of the order dated 27.10.2020 passed by the Joint Commissioner directing the petitioner to deposit the licensed weapon with the nearest police station, the petitioner has failed to deposit the weapon. He, however, fairly admits that the appeal against the order of the suspension would be maintainable in terms of Section 18 of the Arms Act.

9. The learned counsel for the petitioner in rejoinder submits that the petitioner tried to surrender the weapon, however, surrender was not accepted by the authority stating that the license of the weapon has expired, hence the weapon cannot be deposited.

10. Be that as it may, it is directed that the petitioner shall surrender the weapon in question to the Station House Officer (SHO), Police Station: Vijay Vihar, on 27.05.2024. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to accept the surrender of the weapon, if made by the petitioner.

11. Coming back to the merits of the present petition, Section 18 of the Arms Act reads as under:

    “18. Appeals.―(1) Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority refusing to grant a licence or varying the conditions of a licence or by an order of the licensing authority or the authority to whom the licensing authority is subordinate, suspending or revoking a licence may prefer an appeal against that order to such authority (hereinafter referred to as the appellate authority) and within such period as may be prescribed:
    Provided that no appeal shall lie against any order made by, or under the direction of, the Government.

(2) No appeal shall be admitted if it is preferred after the expiry of the period prescribed therefor:

    Provided that an appeal may be admitted after the expiry of the period prescribed therefor if the appellant satisfies the appellate authority that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within that period.

(3) The period prescribed for an appeal shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (


    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top