SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 19

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION – Appellant
Versus
M/S MITSUI AND CO. – Respondent


Advocates:
SANJAY KUMAR

%

31.01.2023

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

1.

This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2009-2010, and is

directed against the order dated 04.01.2022 passed by the Income Tax

Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”].

2.

The appellant/revenue has proposed the following questions of law:

A. Whether on the facts and circumstance of the case and

in law, the Ld. ITAT erred in holding that the amount

received to assessee on account of off-shore supplies in

respect of Teesta and Purulia projects are not taxable under

the provisions of Section 44BBB of the Act?

B. Whether on the facts and circumstance of the case and in

law, the Ld. ITAT erred in holding that the Liaison Office of

the assessee did not constitute a Permanent Establishment,

ITA 53/2023

page 1 of 3

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2024 at 22:45:51

liable to tax in India when the said office was clearly a fixed

place and the activities carried out could not be said to be

preparatory or auxiliary in nature?

C. Whether on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top