SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9818

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SANJAY TIKU & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR. – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

MINI PUSHKARNA, J: (ORAL)

CM APPL. 10380/2024 & CM APPL. 10422/2024 (For Exemptions)

1. Exemptions allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. Applications are disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2543/2024 & CM APPL. 10379/2024

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the action of the respondent no. 2/IDBI Bank to declare the account of the petitioners as ‘Fraud’ purportedly in terms of Master Direction on Frauds-Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and select FIs bearing No. RBI/DBS/2016-17/28 DBS. CO. CMFC.BC. No. 1/23/04.001/2016-17 dated 1st July, 2016 updated as on 03rd July, 2017 issued by the respondent no.1-Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”).

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid action by the respondent no. 2-bank is patently illegal, as the same has been done without following the Principles of Natural Justice, as directed to be read in the Master Circular by the Supreme Court vide judgment in the case of State Bank of India & Ors Vs.

Rajesh Aggarwal & Ors, reported as 2023 SCC OnLine SC 342.

5. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court to the E-mail dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top