ORDER

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A.5059/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1283/2024, CRL.M.A.5058/2024 1. A petition under Section 482 read with 483 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner challenging order dated 16.01.2024 passed by learned Family Court, South West, Dwarka, New Delhi whereby respondent No.1 (wife) has been permitted to file fresh income affidavit in accordance with judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha and Another, (2021) 2 SCC 324. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner appears on advance notice.

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, the marriage between the petitioner and respondent No.1 was solemnized on 11.12.2019. A petition for divorce was preferred by the petitioner at Family Court at Ahemdabad.

On the other hand, a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was preferred on behalf of the respondent wife before Family Court at Aligarh, which has been transferred to Delhi. In the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., respondent No.1 filed an income asset affidavit, wherein petitioner took a stand regarding furnishing of incorrect infor