SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11376

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR SANJAY ARORA – Appellant
Versus
JASMER – Respondent


O R D E R

%

I.A. 14318/2022 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC)

1. This application has been filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC as part of accompanying suit seeking permanent injunction restraining defendant and all those acting for and on his behalf from manufacturing, selling, using, displaying, advertising, importing, exporting or in any other manner dealing with impugned goods and products bearing the trademark/device/label and or any other trade mark/label/device identical with or deceptively similar to plaintiffs trademark/label/device ‘TIGER’/ .

2. Notice in the application was issued on 6th September, 2022. On 29th February, 2024, when submissions were heard on behalf of counsel for plaintiff, a set of additional documents filed on 1st March, 2023 were adverted to. However, as the counsel for defendant stated that he did not have a copy of the same, it was directed that documents be supplied to defendant, despite the fact that they were filed one year prior.

3. On 29th February, 2024, two photographs were adverted to by counsel for plaintiff to show that in 2014, defendant was actually an employee of plaintiff, who had already been using the registered trademark ‘TIGER’ w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top