SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8243

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, A, C, Tushar Rao Gedela, JJ
GANTAVYA GULATI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
W.P.(CRL) 2474/2024



Advocates:
GANTAVYA GULATI

The court directed the Union of India to treat the writ petition as a representation regarding the restoration of legal protections against non-consensual sexual acts, highlighting a legislative gap post-repeal of Section 377 IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 377 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Legal protection against non-consensual sexual acts - The petitioner seeks restoration of protections equivalent to repealed Section 377 IPC for the safety of individuals, particularly from the LGBTQIA+ community, highlighting a legislative gap post-repeal. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Legislative Gap - The absence of equivalent provisions in the new laws poses a threat to dignity and safety of individuals, undermining progressive jurisprudence established by the Supreme Court. (Paras 2-3)

(C) Government's Response - The Government is in the process of receiving inputs on new criminal laws and will take a holistic view on observations received. (Paras 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner argues that the repeal of Section 377 IPC has left individuals, especially from the LGBTQIA+ community, without legal recourse against non-consensual sexual acts.

Findings of Court:
The Court disposes of the writ petition with a direction to the Union of India to treat it as a representation and decide it expeditiously.

Issues: The main issue is the lack of legal protection against non-consensual sexual acts following the repeal of Section 377 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the need for the Government to address the legislative gap and ensure protection for vulnerable communities.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions.

O R D E R

1. Present public interest petition has been filed seeking issuance of directions to the respondent to restore legal protection against non- consensual sexual acts, equivalent to those provided under the now-repealed Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“ IPC ”) to ensure the safety and dignity of individuals, particularly those from the LGBTQIA+ community, who are at risk of non-consensual sexual acts in the absence of such protection.

2. Petitioner, who appears in person, states that Section 377 IPC , prior to its repeal, criminalised non-consensual sexual acts with any man, woman or animal, thus providing a critical legal recourse for victims of such acts, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation. He states that after repeal of Section 377 IPC , the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“ BNS ”)

excludes any provision equivalent to Section 377 of the IPC for providing protection against non-consensual sexual acts. He states that such legislative gap poses a significant threat to the safety and dignity of individuals, particularly those from the LGBTQIA+ community, who are now left without adequate legal protection against such acts.

3. He submits that this omission undermines the progressive jurisprudence established by the Supreme Court in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1 , which decriminalised consensual same- sex relationships and emphasised the protection of the dignity and autonomy of LGBTQIA+ individuals.

4. Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, learned CGSC for Union of India/respondent nos.1 and 2 prays that the present writ petition be directed to be treated as a representation to the respondent as the Government is in the process of receiving observations/inputs on the new Criminal laws from various stakeholders. He states that the Government will take a holistic view on all such observations/inputs received. He has also handed over a copy of letter dated 27th August, 2024 written by him to the Joint Secretary to the Government of India. The relevant portion of the said letter reads as under:

“I am directed to refer to the above mentioned subject wherein the petitioner has requested the Hon’ble Court to direct the UOI to restore legal protections against non-consensual sexual acts, equivalent to those provided under the now-repealed Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code to ensure the safety and dignity of individuals, particularly those from the LGBTQ+ community, who are at risk of non-consensual sexual acts in the absence of such protections.

2. In regard to the instant Writ Petition, it is stated that the new Criminal laws i.e., the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 have come into force w.e.f. 1.7.2024. The Government is receiving observations/inputs on these new Criminal laws from various stakeholders. Government will take a holistic view on all such observations/inputs received.....”

5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, this Court disposes of the present writ petition and the application with a direction to the Union of India to treat the present writ petition as a representation and decide the same as expeditiously as possible. In the event, there is inordinate delay in considering the petitioner’s representation, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present writ petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top