Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
RAMJAS FOUNDATION – Appellant
Versus
SMT SHUBRA GUPTA AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clarification of applications filed by both parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of the ramjas foundation and the agm. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. details of the contested meetings and actions taken. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments from the plaintiff regarding the validity of the agm. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. counterarguments from the defendants on the legality of the agm. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. rejoinder by the plaintiff addressing the defendants' claims. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. court's overview of the case and parties' positions. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. court's analysis of the moa and agm's compliance. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. further court observations on the validity of the agm. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 10. court's decision on the interim relief sought by the plaintiff. (Para 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 11. application for impleadment by new parties. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 12. arguments from the applicants for impleadment. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 13. plaintiff's opposition to the impleadment application. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 14. court's ruling on the impleadment a |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
