SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 18562

$~J-

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 06th November 2023 + W.P.(C) 10836/2023 and CM APPL. 41962/2023 ARYAN KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH FATHER RAVINDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja Dhar and Ms. S. Ambica, Advocates.

versus KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa and Mr. R.

Gowrishankar, Advocates for R1 and R2.

Mr. Ashok Kumar and Ms. Chhavi Arora, Advocates for R3.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

J U D G M E N T

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J.

By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is about 17 years of age and a student of Class-XI at respondent No.1/Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sector- 12, Dwarka, New Delhi Branch („respondent school‟), seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus or an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent school to promote him to Class-XII, by taking into consideration the marks secured by him in Physical Education in the Class-XI Examinations instead of his marks in Mathematics, which (latter) subject he has failed to qualify.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

2. Respondent No. 2 is the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan („KVS‟), which is a body under the Ministry of Education, Government of India, that governs and controls the respondent school; and respondent No. 3 is the Central Board of Secondary Education („CBSE‟), which is the body that inter-alia conducts public examinations for Class-X and Class-XII based on a common curriculum. It is the curriculum and Bye-Laws of the CBSE that are in contention in the present matter.

3. To have their students sit the examinations conducted by the CBSE, a school requires to be „affiliated‟ to the CBSE. It is the admitted position that the respondent school is affiliated to the CBSE and therefore CBSE Bye-Laws are applicable to that school, as detailed hereinafter.

4. Notice on this petition was issued on 16.08.2023; whereupon counter-

affidavit dated 17.09.2023 has been filed by the respondent school and KVS. A short counter-affidavit dated 03.10.2023 has also been filed by the CBSE. Written submissions have also been filed on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent school.

BRIEF FACTS

5. In Class-XI the petitioner opted for English, Business Studies, Accountancy, Economics and Mathematics as his 05 „main subjects‟. In addition to that, the petitioner opted for Physical Education as an „additional subject‟. In March 2023 the petitioner sat his final examinations for Class-XI and as per the results declared on

28.03.2023, he has obtained the following marks :

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

Subjects Final Theory (80) Practical/ Project (20) Overall Marks (100) Overall Grade
Business Studies 27 15 42 C2
Accountancy 27 15 42 C2
English 41 13 54 C1
Economics 27 12 39 D
Mathematics 12 14 26 E

6. It may be stated here for clarity, that as per the rules of the CBSE, as detailed hereinafter, if a subject involves a theory and practical / project paper, to be able to qualify, a student must obtain atleast 33% marks in each of the theory and practical / project papers as also 33%

marks in the aggregate.

7. The breakup of marks that the petitioner got in the initial and supplementary examinations in Mathematics are as follows :

Examination Final Theory (80) Practical/Project (20) Overall Marks (100)
Initial Examination 12 14 26
Supplementary Examination 19 14 33

8. Since the petitioner obtained less than 33% marks in Mathematics, he was required to take a supplementary examination in that subject. However, even in the supplementary examination held on 19.04.2023, he was unable to secure 33% marks, and the school accordingly declared him as an „essential repeat‟ on 29.04.2023, that is to say, he has been asked to repeat Class-XI.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

9. However, in the additional subject, i.e. Physical Education the petitioner scored the following marks :

Subject Final Theory (70) Practical/ Project (30) Overall Marks (100) Overall Grade
Physical Education 26 15 41 C2

10. The essential contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that since the school is affiliated to the CBSE, it is bound by the CBSE Examination Bye-Laws, 1995 („CBSE Examination Bye-Laws‟); and that as per the CBSE Examination Bye-Laws, the petitioner is allowed to substitute the marks secured by him in Physical Education in place of the marks secured in Mathematics.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top