SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 10744

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PARAMJEET – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1. This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 379/2020 dated 22.06.2020 under sections 363/354/34 of IPC and section 12 of POCSO Act registered at PS Bawana and subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom. The said FIR was lodged at the complaint of the respondent No. 2 herein who is the grandmother of the victim i.e. respondent No. 3 herein.

2. Learned counsel submits that the Chargesheet in the said matter has already been filed. It has been submitted that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by the learned ASJ, Rohini Courts, Delhi vide order dated 06.07.2020.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and 3 submits that the complainant/Respondent No.2 and the victim/ Respondent No.3 are supporting the prayers sought for in the present petition on account of the settlement arrived at between the parties. The affidavits of both Respondent No. 2 and respondent No. 3 (through her father) are on record and reflect that the parties have settled the matter and have no objection if the present FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

4. Learned counsel for the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top