SURINDER KUMAR PAWAN KUMAR THR SHRI SURINDER KUMAR vs LAXMAN DAS DHANWARIA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Mr. J.K. Bhola, Mr. Shashank Kumar, Mr. Mohit Mittal and Ms. Muskan Bhola, Advocates for Petitioner
Through:Mr. Anand Singh, Advocate

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J.:

By way of this petition, brought under proviso to Section 25B(8) of

the Delhi Rent Control Act, the petitioner/tenant has assailed order dated

21.01.2015 of the learned Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts,

Delhi whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlord under

Section 14(1)(e) of the Act was allowed since despite service of summons in

the prescribed format, the petitioner/tenant opted not to file application

seeking leave to contest the proceedings. On service of notice of the present

proceedings, the respondent/landlord entered appearance through counsel. I

heard learned counsel for both sides.

GIRISH

KATHPALIA

Digitally signed by GIRISH

KATHPALIA

Date: 2024.03.14 14:23:26 +05'30'

Digitally Signed

By:VAISHALI CHAUHAN

Signing Date:14.03.2024

17:36:25

Signature Not Verified

RC.REV. 90/2015 Page 2 of 10 pages

Briefly stated, relevant circumstances extracted from pleadings and

records are as follows. The present respondent, claiming himself to be the

owner and landlord in respect of the shop bearing private No. A (hereinafter