SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3953

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1909/2023 & CM APPL. 4486/2024 GUNJAN KUMAR & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Ms. Sumitra Choudhary with Ms. Renu Bajpai, Mr. MK Raghav Raman, Mr. Vivek Yadav, Ms. Nitya Sharma and Ms. Jasmine, Advocates. (M): 8800556098 Email: skllawyerandsolicitor@gmail.com versus VEDANT ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA % 24.01.2024

Advocates:
SUMITRA KUMARI CHOUDHARY

ORDER

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking stringent action against the respondent for aggravated contempt for violating the order dated 19 CM APPL. 4486/2024 th

2. Attention of this Court has been drawn to the E-mail dated 21 January, 2024 passed in the present contempt proceedings and making scandalous imputations against the judiciary.

st January, 2024 written by the respondent, the libellous paragraphs of which read as under:-

    “xxx xxx xxx orders either in CS no. 51721/16 and CS no. 1240/18 and High court orders adjudication about the applicant status in Canara bank is off probationary not confirmed and applicant belongs to SC community and entire one year the canara bank did not pay the applicant his legitimate perks and allowance due to his caste status, thus not independent justice of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi coming in the aid of sikri & co who signed the prayer clauses in CS no. 51721/16 and CS No. 1240/18 and wants that applicant forgo his fundamental right and filed civil suits thus choose money instead of constitution as believed that applicant i.e Vedant is dog and second class of citizen as the real intention of the corrupt judiciary to put stamp on the SC/ST people that these people doing litigation only for money as these people not having any respect/status and wants to portrait the applicant vedant is prostitute but in reality those who believe in this thought are really are prostitutes (apology to Hon'ble Court as no substitute word is fitting in present line) , whereas the money is also important for applicant vedant for livelihood but not by murdering the constitution of India.
    xxx xxx xxx That order of 03.08.2018 of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Review Petition no. 300/17 & 299/17 in LPA 846/2015 & 854/15 is entire cause of corruption in CS no. 1240/18 and CS no. 51721/18, wherein the not independent ex justice of Delhi High Court under the influence of sikri & co, made observation that “Later, bank appears to have filed a suit claiming certain additional amount after a purported adjustment of the amount payable to petitioner” modification application in order dated 03.08.2018 before DHC, than humble answer that the corrupt judiciary wants from applicant vedant so that constitution will die and civil suit remained. Whereas again question why not SC of India in SLP than again humble answer corrupt system wants the same by mentioning first order obtained on basis of fraud than no relief to applicant vedant justice delayed justice denied, thus waited for period to see how the corrupt judiciary will go upto what extent, and how people of India not getting any real justice from the cornis when corruption in judiciary exist in India .

13. That why Sh. Gunjan Kumar went to high court in suo motto contempt against the applicant u/a 215 of COI, without permission of Attorney General as per guidelines of article 215 of COI, because the not independent judiciary wants that whatever the corruption happened in writ and review proceedings can be rectified under article 215, but article 215 Hon’ble High court can rectified own order using review jurisdiction but applicant vedant already filed review petition than how review of review maintainable, hence applicant know that there would be punishment in contempt petition and than division bench while awarding punishment will rectified order dated 03.08.2018 using power of writ court, thus contempt petition of Sh. Gunjan Kumar is sponsored petition only to file to fill the lacna for corruption happened in last 10 years with applicant vedant by the corrupt judges, as court always remain non-living being and always have respect but always presided by living being sometimes corrupt that’s travesty within system. xxx xxxxx xxxxx 15. That the CS no. 51721/16 is also one of its own case of corruption as order 37 suit based



    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top