DELHI HIGH COURT
REHRI PATRI EKTA MANCH SUBHASH PARK AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
MCD AND ORS – Respondent
WP(C)-12183_2023
W.P.(C) 12183/2023 Page 1 of 9
$~S-22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 12183/2023
REHRI PATRI EKTA MANCH SUBHASH PARK AND ORS
..... Petitioners
versus
MCD AND ORS
..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate.
For the Respondents :
Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel for R-1/MCD.
Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for R-3 & R-
4/SHO.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
J U D G M E N T
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J. (OPEN COURT)
CM APPL. 49520/2023 (for deleting the petitioner Nos. 6, 8 and 25 from
the array of memo of parties and to put on record the amended memo
of parties)
Digitally Signed
By:AANCHAL TAGGAR
Signing Date:06.10.2023
10:44:20
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 12183/2023 Page 2 of 9
1. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil
Procedure (CPC), 1908, has been instituted on behalf of the
applicants/petitioner Nos. 6, 8 and 25, praying as follows:-
“In the facts and circumstances stated herein
above, it is Most Respectfully prayed that this
Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
I. Allow the Petitioner No.6, 8 & 25 to withdraw
from the present petition with liberty to avail the
appropriate legal remedies.
II. Allow the Petitioner No.6, 8 & 25 for deletion
from the array of memo of parties in the present
writ petition.
III. Allow to put on record the amended memo of
parties.
IV. Pass any such directions or order that this
Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts
and circumstances of the above-mentioned case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE
PETITIONER AS IN DUTY BOUND SHALL
EVER PRAY.”
2. Issue notice.
3. Ms. Puja Kalra, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of
the non-applicant/respondent No. 1/MCD and Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned
Standing Counsel (Criminal) accepts notice on behalf of the non-
applicants/respondent Nos. 3 and 4/SHO and fairly do not oppose the
present application.
4. In view of the foregoing and the reasons stated in the application,
which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and resultantly,
Digitally Signed
By:AANCHAL TAGGAR
Signing Date:06.10.2023
10:44:20
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 12183/2023 Page 3 of 9
the names of the petitioner No. 6, namely, Mr. Ateequr Rehman, petitioner
No.8, namely, Mr. Saeed Ud Din and petitioner No.25, namely, Mr.
Ameenuddin, are deleted from the array of memo of parties, in the
accompanying writ petition.
5. The application is disposed of accordingly.
6. Let the amended memo of parties be taken on the record forthwith.
W.P.(C) 12183/2023
7. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, 1950, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioners, praying as
follows:-
“In the facts and circumstances stated herein
above, it is Most Respectfully prayed that this
Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
I. Pass an order directing the respondents to allow
the petitioner no. 2 to 25 to peacefully vend in
terms of the Certificate of Vending issued to
them.
II. Pass an Order directing the respondents to
ensure that the petitioner no. 2 to 25 be allowed to
peacefully vend on their vending sites i.e. On the
Footpath, Neta Ji Subhash Park to Jama Masjid
Metro Station Gate No-4, City SP Zone, Ward-
85-N without any hindrance being caused by any
public official.”
8. Issue notice.
9. Ms. Puja Kalra, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of
Digitally Signed
By:AANCHAL TAGGAR
Signing Date:06.10.2023
10:4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.