2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9350
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURENDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS (CBN) – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-1212/2023 2023:DHC:6309
BAIL APPLN. 1212/2023
Page 1 of 12
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: August 22, 2023
+
BAIL APPLN. 1212/2023
SURENDER KUMAR
..... Applicant
Through:
Mr. Aditya Aggarwal and Mr. Naveen
Panwar, Advocates
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS (CBN) ..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing
Counsel and Mr. Gagan Vaswani,
Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
J U D G M E N T
1.
The applicant vide the present application under Section 439 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeks regular bail in File No.
P&I/Del/Seizure/02/2019 registered under Section (s) 8/21/22/28/29/30 of
the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [NDPS Act] at
Central Bureau of Narcotics [CBN].
2.
As per the complaint, a secret information was received by Sh. D.S.
Singh, Superintendent (Prev.) Preventive and Intelligence Cell, CBN on
15.10.2019 at 09:30 AM, that a person namely Surender Kumar, proprietor
of RND Distributors (the applicant herein) is engaged in the business of
purchasing and selling of illegal/NDPS medicines without bill in his shop
bearing Shop no.1 LSC, Block-A, Mangolpuri, Delhi. The secret
Digitally Signed
By:BABLOO SHAH
Signing Date:01.09.2023
21:03:33
Signature Not Verified
BAIL APPLN. 1212/2023
Page 2 of 12
information was thus forwarded to the concerned superior in compliance of
Section 42 of the NDPS Act.
3.
Resultantly, a preventive team was constituted which left for
conducting raid at the applicant’s shop. On reaching there at 13:45 PM, the
preventive team along with the independent witnesses went to the
applicant’s shop and informed him about the secret information and that his
shop had to be searched.
4.
Before search, the accused was made aware about his rights in
compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act and the preventive team offered
their search before the search of applicant and his shop. After search of the
preventive team, the search of the applicant’s shop was conducted. During
the search of the shop of the applicant, 9 types of medicines, alleged to be
NDPS medicines, were recovered.
5.
The complaint further alleges that during search of the said shop, the
preventive team found a broken wall which was the passage to another shop,
which was locked. Upon breaking the said lock, in addition to the above, 17
types of NDPS medicines were also found, alleged to be stored by the
applicant.
6.
Later, the applicant voluntarily disclosed that few medicines
containing narcotics substance, were kept in a room on the roof. The search
whereof further unearthed 9 types of NDPS medicines.
7.
During the raid, many people gathered near the shop which created
commotion and further search could not be made possible in that situation.
Resultantly, the raiding team loaded the medicines on a truck which
proceeded for CBN Office at 09:30 PM. Upon reaching the CBN Office, the
medicines were unloaded and segregated batch wise and sampling was done.
Digitally Signed
By:BABLOO SHAH
Signing Date:01.09.2023
21:03:33
Signature Not Verified
BAIL APPLN. 1212/2023
Page 3 of 12
From the 45 batches of medicines, one sample along with their duplicate
was taken out from every batch, marked, packed and sealed with the seal of
CBN.
8.
Thereupon, the applicant was arrested on 16.10.2019 and after
completion of investigation, complaint was filed before the competent
Court.
9.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant
has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that as no
samples were drawn on the spot and the unsealed seized medicines were
taken to the CBN Office, the same was in contravention of the Standing
Order No.1 of 1988 dated 15.03.1988, which is reproduced hereinunder:
effect should invariably be made in the panchnama drawn on the spot.”
10.
In support of the aforesaid argument, learned counsel places reliance
on Amani F