SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9609

DELHI HIGH COURT
MASTER ADITYA VIKRAM KANSAGRA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MR. PERRY KANSAGARA – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 12th October, 2023

+ MAT. APP. (F.C.) 115/2020

MASTER ADITYA VIKRAM KANSAGRA & ANR. ... Appellants

versus

MR. PERRY KANSAGARA

..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellant:

Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Ms. Mansi Sharma, Ms. Shreya

Singhal and Ms. Astha Baderiya Advocates.

For the Respondents: Ex-Parte

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1.

Appellant impugns order dated 22.02.2020 whereby in respect

of a petition filed by the Appellants, under Section 18 and 20 of the

Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as

the Act), the Family Court directed the appellants to segregate the

amount of maintenance claimed by each of them and directed

Appellant No. 2 to pay ad-valorem court fee on the amount claimed

by her.

Digitally Signed

By:RASHIM KAPOOR

Signing Date:12.10.2023

17:42:54

Signature Not Verified

2.

Appellant No. 1 is the son of the Respondent and the Appellant

No. 2 is the wife of the Respondent and moth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top