DELHI HIGH COURT
MS. SHAZIA REHMAN – Appellant
Versus
MR. ANWAR ELAHI & ORS. – Respondent
CS(COMM)-245/2019 2023:DHC:5563
CS(COMM.)245/2019 Page 1 of 16
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 27th July, 2023
Pronounced on: 09th August, 2023
+
CS(COMM) 245/2019
MS. SHAZIA REHMAN ..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr.Vipul
Ganda,
Ms.Abhipsa
Mohanty and Ms.Priyanka Jindal,
Advocates.
versus
MR. ANWAR ELAHI & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through:
Mr.Aditya Singh, Mr.Arpit Kumar
singh and Ms.Mehak, Advocates
for D1 & D2.
Ms.Gurkamal Hora Arora and
Mr.Jaisal Baath, Advocates for D3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
I.A.1143/2020
1.
This application is filed by the applicant under Order VII Rule 10
and 11 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking rejection of plaint. The
plaintiff has filed the suit as a commercial suit under the Commercial
Courts Act, 2015 seeking relief of declaration, permanent and mandatory
injunction with regard to 4556 shares, got transferred by defendant no.1
in his favour. The defendants no.1 and 2 have challenged the
maintainability of the present suit as a commercial suit under the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
2.
It is submitted as per definition of “commercial dispute” as
provided in Section 2(1)(c)(xii) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 only
Digitally Signed
By:PRADEEP SHARMA
Signing Date:09.08.2023 16:13
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM.)245/2019 Page 2 of 16
disputes arising out of shareholders agreement with regard to shares shall
be commercial disputes but in the present suit there is no shareholders
agreement being entered into between the parties, hence it cannot be
treated as a commercial suit.
3.
It is submitted present suit relate to a family dispute between the
family of defendant no.3- the father-in-law of plaintiff on the other hand
and family of defendant no.1. It is submitted the plaint be rejected as the
case pertain to rectification of register of members, hence only the NCLT
shall have the jurisdiction and per Section 430 of Companies Act no civil
suit is maintainable for rectification of the shares. Sections 59, 424 and
430 of the Companies Act are as under:
424. Procedure before Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal.— (1) The
of discharging their functions under this Act, the same powers as are
vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of
1908) while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:—
Digitally Signed
By:PRADEEP SHARMA
Signing Date:09.08.2023 16:13
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM.)245/2019 Page 3 of 16
within the local limits of whose jurisdiction,—
430. Civil court not to have jurisdiction.— No civil court shall have
or the Appellate Tribunal.”
4.
It is the submission of the learned counsel for the defendant, the
plaintiff‟s shares were transferred in favour of defendant no.1 in the year
2011 and plaintiff never objected to the same at that moment. In the year
2016, her father in law i.e., defendant no.3 rather filed a petition before
NCLT wherein he alleged about the shares of plaintiff having come
down. The plaintiff was also a party to the said petition but never
objected to the reduction of shares and neither she filed an application
Digitally Signed
By:PRADEEP SHARMA
Signing Date:09.08.2023 16:13
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM.)245/2019 Page 4 of 16
for rectification of register. In the year 2019 the plaintiff had filed a suit
challenging the reduction of her shares and since the case pertains to the
rectification of the register hence per Section 59 and 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.