HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAVIN SACHDEV PROPRIETOR OF M/S SEAMS – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)
1. Petitioner impugns order dated 18.05.2023, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner impugning the Order-in-Original dated
25.08.2022 has been dismissed on the limited ground of delay.
2. Impugned order records that a delay of maximum period of one month could be condoned under Section 107(4) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [“GST Act”] and as the subject appeal has been filed with a delay of two months, the same could not be condoned.
3. As per the petitioner, petitioner made an application seeking refund on 27.06.2022. The Assistant Commissioner rejected the application seeking refund by order dated 25.08.2022. The statutory period of filing an appeal against the order was three months. Petitioner filed an appeal thereto through the online portal on
22.11.2022, within the period of three months.
4. Petitioner has produced before this Court the digital record of the documents filed with the appeal. It is noticed that the appeal that was digitally filed also contained the scanned copy of the original Order-in-Original dated 25.08.2022.
5. Section 107 of the GST Act reads as under:-
“(1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.