SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7370

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
RAJ KUMARI TANEJA – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER KUMAR & ANR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

21.08.2024

ARB.P. 862/2023

1. This is a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, “the 1996 Act”hereinafter for reference of the disputes between the parties to arbitration.

2. The dispute arises in the context of a Partnership Deed dated 25 February 2017, relating to Respondent 2 partnership firm, of which the petitioner and Respondent 1 are partners.

3. Partnership Deed envisaged resolution of disputes by arbitration, vide Clause 14 of the Partnership Deed, which reads thus:

“14. That in the case of dispute between the partners, the same shall be decided under the provision of Indian Arbitration Act theninforce.”

4. As the disputes arose between the petitioner and the respondents and there is no pre-arbitral protocol envisaged in the afore-extracted arbitration clause, the petitioner, on 6 May 2023, addressed a legal notice to the respondents proposing reference of the disputes between them to arbitration.

5. The respondents replied by a communication dated 29 May 2023, disputing any liability towards the petitioner.

6. As the parties, therefore, have not been able to arrive at a consensus regarding arbitration, despite the existence of an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top