Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
CHARAN SINGH @ BABLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application filed for grant (Para 1) |
| 2. applicant in custody for over 4 years (Para 2) |
| 3. details of the incident leading to fir (Para 3) |
| 4. delay in fir registration (Para 4) |
| 5. contradictions in witness testimony (Para 5) |
| 6. cctv footage contradicts witness claims (Para 6) |
| 7. charge-sheet filed in september 2018 (Para 7 , 9) |
| 8. material contradictions in testimony (Para 8) |
| 9. prosecution's failure to link injuries (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. cctv footage considered holistically (Para 24) |
| 11. medical record supports prosecution case (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 12. bail application dismissed (Para 30) |
| 13. gravity of offence and defined role (Para 31) |
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. First Bail Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’)/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘B.N.S.S.’) has been filed on behalf of the Applicant, Charan Singh @ Babli, for grant of Regular Bail in FIR No. 228/2018 under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ IPC ’) read with S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
